We have been waiting to see what occurs on Servergate, however, today we have come into information that is so explosive that it needs to be released. The email crisis will be Hillary's Waterloo.
We have heard from individuals in the government with top clearances and who spoke to us anonymously. These people tell us that it is virtually impossible for classified documents (confidential, secret and top secret) to be transmitted from government secure networks to insecure networks such as Hillary's stand alone server. Secure locations have NO access to insecure ones. Therefore, the only way to move this data is for someone to physically or electronically copy the information in the secure location and then move it to the insecure one. Someone on Hillary's staff or Hillary herself had to do do this.
In your home or office computer there are additional drives and slots for your thumb drive and other tools to back up data. Government computers don't have those for the very reason, it eliminates anyone taking the data, selling it or being given to a foreign nation.
Jonathan Pollard has spent years in jail for copying secret data and giving it to the Israelis. Should Hillary face the same sentence? Yes, she did not "give it away" however, having an insecure server is an open invitation for foreign operatives to steal it.
The other point that these individuals tell us is that the computer networks are segregated. For example, Top Secret information can only be accessed by certain individuals using top secret codes. The same goes for all levels of government secrets.
So how did Hillary get the top secret information on her server? The only way is working with someone who would commit the crime of copying the data. Could she have "ordered" individuals to take confidential information?
Right now, we would not want to be one of Hillary's co-workers as she will be looking to offload the responsibility. It expect it will be like a normal Clinton reaction. Scorched earth! She will blame someone or several, be indignant, absolve herself of all responsibility and encourage the Justice Department to convict those who did the dastardly deed. Anyone who might have been near the opertation should seek legal counsel immediately and had better sell out Hillary before they are placed in front of the Clinton Blame Machine.
Cheryl Mills and Huna Abedin are two potential targets in our view. They were/are close confidants of Hillary, both had their Blackberry devices destroyed and neither have turned over all of the emails they have received from Hillary. We expect they will be targets of any Justice Department investigation.
Servergate, as we have called this, is going to be as big as Watergate and will destroy more lives and careers. We suspect that the Benghazi deaths of Chris Stevens and his compatriots might be related to this catastrophe. What other information has been lost will make the Wikileaks look like a school house prank.
Hillary will not survive this. She made major mistakes and is going to pay for it handsomely.
Conservative Tom
P.S. Michael Savage (Savage Nation) on today's program (August 20, 2015) had information that confirms that we had received from our sources.
Michael Hayden: Hillary's Emails a 'Juicy Target' for Foreign Spies
Wednesday, 19 Aug 2015 09:54 AM
Retired Gen. Michael Hayden, who has run the nation's spy agencies in the past, said Wednesday he would have "moved heaven and Earth" to get his hands on the emails of a foreign minister had that person used a private server like Hillary Clinton did while she was secretary of state.
"What would I have done as the director of the NSA against a foreign minister who had done that?" the former National Security Agency and Central Intelligence Agency director told MSNBC's "Morning Joe" program.
"I'd move heaven and Earth to access the private email account of a foreign minister, and I'd really go after an email account in which the official and the unofficial emails were co-mingled. You put a very juicy target out there."
Story continues below video.
The news that the Denver-based company that maintained Clinton's "home-brew" private email account was a "mom and pop shop" was especially stunning, said Hayden, considering the sensitive nature of the Clinton files, said Hayden.
The Daily Mail revealed this week that the company, Platte River Networks, until recently operated its business from a converted loft apartment where servers were housed in a bathroom closet.
Hayden said Wednesday it would not have been difficult for spies, NSA or otherwise, to access the server.
"They do this all the time against better defended targets than we saw in the loft in the apartment in Denver," said Hayden.
But the "fundamental sin," said Hayden, wasn't only the use of a private server, but the decision itself to allow Clinton to co-mingle her personal, private emails with her government accounts.
"There's a big gray area that exists even in the unclassified government email accounts," said Hayden. "But you're firewalled against most wrongdoing there by the fact you're using a government account that has some protections to it."
But once you remove the protections afforded by the government system, communications are wide open, said Hayden, and he's "stunned that her staff allowed her to do that in 2009, given the unhappy outcome that this guaranteed, once you started doing that."
Even without worrying about the legal implications, he continued, the actions were "stupid and dangerous" to "her, to the Republic, and to American secrets, but I don't even think it was legal."
Hayden pointed out that he did not have a smartphone himself until he left government "because of the sensitivity of the information I would put on there, even if it were unclassified."
And to a foreign intelligence agency, the emails would have been "attractive targets," but a government server would have protected even what Clinton believed to be "unclassified emails, rather than this role of the dice for some private company."
Further, Clinton has asserted that none of the emails she sent were marked classified, but Hayden said that as a public figure, "when you are using an unclassified forum, you have got to filter what it is you say."
"She created an environment in which people could only communicate with her through this one medium," said Hayden, adding that he also cannot back Clinton's claims that other secretaries had used private emails as well.
"The fact of the matter is, when we first learned of the private server, that was incomprehensible for anybody with my kind of background in government," said Hayden.
But even though the server that has been surrendered has been "wiped" clean of information, Hayden said that there are many circumstances in which the data can be restored.
"The NSA has gone after servers that have been captured in raids overseas that the target thought it was wiped, and the NSA has been able to retrieve the data," said Hayden.
Related Stories:
© 2015 Newsmax. All rights reserved."What would I have done as the director of the NSA against a foreign minister who had done that?" the former National Security Agency and Central Intelligence Agency director told MSNBC's "Morning Joe" program.
"I'd move heaven and Earth to access the private email account of a foreign minister, and I'd really go after an email account in which the official and the unofficial emails were co-mingled. You put a very juicy target out there."
Story continues below video.
The news that the Denver-based company that maintained Clinton's "home-brew" private email account was a "mom and pop shop" was especially stunning, said Hayden, considering the sensitive nature of the Clinton files, said Hayden.
The Daily Mail revealed this week that the company, Platte River Networks, until recently operated its business from a converted loft apartment where servers were housed in a bathroom closet.
Hayden said Wednesday it would not have been difficult for spies, NSA or otherwise, to access the server.
"They do this all the time against better defended targets than we saw in the loft in the apartment in Denver," said Hayden.
But the "fundamental sin," said Hayden, wasn't only the use of a private server, but the decision itself to allow Clinton to co-mingle her personal, private emails with her government accounts.
"There's a big gray area that exists even in the unclassified government email accounts," said Hayden. "But you're firewalled against most wrongdoing there by the fact you're using a government account that has some protections to it."
Even without worrying about the legal implications, he continued, the actions were "stupid and dangerous" to "her, to the Republic, and to American secrets, but I don't even think it was legal."
Hayden pointed out that he did not have a smartphone himself until he left government "because of the sensitivity of the information I would put on there, even if it were unclassified."
And to a foreign intelligence agency, the emails would have been "attractive targets," but a government server would have protected even what Clinton believed to be "unclassified emails, rather than this role of the dice for some private company."
Further, Clinton has asserted that none of the emails she sent were marked classified, but Hayden said that as a public figure, "when you are using an unclassified forum, you have got to filter what it is you say."
"She created an environment in which people could only communicate with her through this one medium," said Hayden, adding that he also cannot back Clinton's claims that other secretaries had used private emails as well.
"The fact of the matter is, when we first learned of the private server, that was incomprehensible for anybody with my kind of background in government," said Hayden.
But even though the server that has been surrendered has been "wiped" clean of information, Hayden said that there are many circumstances in which the data can be restored.
Related Stories:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for commenting. Your comments are needed for helping to improve the discussion.