Words Like "Terror Watch List" Or Common Sense Gun Laws" Only Mean Less Freedom For Americans. 1984 Is NOW!

‘Terror watch list’ and ‘common-sense gun laws’ are code words designed to get you to surrender your rights

Posted on December 8, 2015 by Bob Livingston

Change agents operate in the backrooms and inner sanctums of government power where they devise code words and phrases they use to dumb the people down, shut down contrarian thought and trick people into surrendering their rights. I have written about some of these words and phrases before in “Code Words,” “More Code Words” and some other columns.

There are two at play right now that are infesting the lexicon of the regime and pundit class that I must point out to you. They are “terror watch list” and “common-sense gun laws,” and both are being thrown at you ad nauseam by the gun grabbers.

President Barack Obama, his minions and the anti-2nd Amendment media are making the claim that people on the terror watch list should not be allowed to purchase or own guns. But the terror watch list is an arbitrary list of some 700,000 people who may or may not have any ties to terrorism.

The list was begun under the regime of Bush the lesser in the wake of 9/11. It is composed of names submitted by government organizations, and one can find his name on it for no apparent reason. And many people are. The list includes journalists, congressweasels, their spouses, nonviolent political activists, actors, former military members and at least 72 employees of the Department of Homeland Security.

The list was a (likely intentionally) flawed concept from the get-go. In 2002, Salon.com reported the list seemed to be netting, “mostly priests, elderly nuns, Green Party campaign operatives, left-wing journalists, right-wing activists and people affiliated with Arab or Arab-American groups.” But note that real terrorists like Syed Rizwan Farook, Tashfeen Malik, Mohammad Youssef Abdulazeez, Elton Simpson, Nadir Hamid Soofi or Nidal Hassan were not on the list.

One is not notified of his appearance on the list until he attempts to purchase an airline ticket or interact with the federal government in some way that requires identification. It is difficult, if not impossible, to get your name removed from the list because the list is classified and the government is not required to provide you with the information it used to put you on the list.

Denying one access to travel, or purchase of a weapon, based on the list is a denial of due process. And given that the government has stated in published missives that people who oppose Obama’s policies; people who stockpile food; people who oppose one-world government; Christians; military veterans returning from overseas engagements; people unhappy with the government’s actions at Waco, Texas, and Ruby Ridge, Idaho; and people opposed to gun control could be considered as terrorists, it’s a wonder the list is not longer.

And as I revealed two years ago, members of the U.S. military are increasingly being conditioned (i.e., brainwashed) into perceiving constitutionalists, Tea Party members, 2ndAmendment advocates and members of the liberty movement as terrorists through the Combating Terrorism Center at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, New York. It has a report that links the mainstream conservative movement and the violent “far right,” and describes conservatives as living in the past and liberals as being “future oriented.”

The report lumps limited government activists into three categories it claims are responsible for 350 “attacks initiated by far-right groups/individuals” in 2011: racist/white supremacists, anti-Federalists and fundamentalists. The report did not define what makes an attack a “far-right” action, nor did it list specific events except to compare them to the bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City (a likely false flag attack exploited by President Bill Clinton to bolster his sagging presidency) and the Atlanta abortion clinic bombing by Eric Robert Rudolph.

“Common-sense gun laws” is a specious and arbitrary term designed to intimidate anyone who opposes more 2nd Amendment restrictions by couching their opposition as the opposite of common sense. This is a typical tactic of oppressors, for no one wants to be perceived as falling on the wrong side of common sense. This term is used in a way similar to how terms like “conspiracy theory,” “anti-Semitic” and “climate denier” are used to shut down conversation.

Whether the laws make “common sense” or not is irrelevant once the established orthodoxy takes hold through repetition by the influence makers in media and government.