Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label Gary Samore. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gary Samore. Show all posts

Monday, October 5, 2015

Obama Has Been A "Friend" Of Iran For Years!

World Leader Accuses Obama of TREASON on the Floor of the United Nations

Lost in the media hype surrounding the addresses of Presidents Barack Obama and Vladimir Putin to the United Nations General Assembly on Monday was a bombshell claim by the president of Argentina.
President Christina Fernandez de Kirchener announced that her nation had been approached by an Obama administration official with a request that Argentina provide enriched nuclear fuel to the Islamic Republic of Iran in 2010.
The official in question was Gary Samore, former White House Coordinator for Arms Control and Weapons of Mass Destruction, who did not dispute the seemingly outrageous claim and has been open about his opposition to the nuclear agreement currently worked out between Obama and Iran.
Kirchener said that Samore wanted Argentina to provide nuclear fuel to Iran, ostensibly to counter Iran’s excuse that they needed nuclear fuel for their reactors, removing the impetus for them to continue their own uranium enrichment program.
Kirchener stated that the deal fell through when her government asked for the request in writing, to abide by proper protocol, at which point the issue was dropped and Kirchener never heard from Samore again about it.
Sponsored by Revcontent

For his part, Samore released a statement admitting that he had in fact traveled to Argentina in 2010 and made the request, though he insinuated the incident was no big deal.
In fact, Samore went on to explain how after Argentina balked at the deal, he subsequently approached France and Russia with a similar proposal in which Iran would send their low-enriched uranium to Russia, which would further enrich it before sending it along to France.
France would in turn finish converting the enriched uranium into nuclear reactor fuel, sending it back to Iran for its own use, ostensibly preventing the Islamic republic from weaponizing its uranium stockpiles.
This deal fell through as well, according to Samore, leading to the 2010 U.N. resolution that increased economic sanctions on Iran, ultimately bringing them to the bargaining table for the horrible deal Obama eventually worked out with them this year.
The White House did not immediately respond to the potentially treasonous allegations.
H/T The Blaze

Thursday, June 25, 2015

Iran Nuke Deal Causes More Furor


Israel Suspends Defense Talks with US Pending Iran Deal


“The lot is cast into the lap, but its every decision is from the Lord.” (Proverbs 16:33)
Israel has decided to suspend talks with US officials over security aid until after the looming Iran nuclear deal is finalized, Walla! reported.
Following a joint meeting between senior officials of the Defense Ministry, Prime Minister’s Office and the Foreign Ministry, it was decided to freeze dialogue between both countries until the conclusion of talks between the Islamic Republic and P5+1 world powers.
Officials told the news site that the main reason for suspending talks was due mainly to increasing tensions between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government and the White House.
An anonymous senior defense official confirmed the decision and explained that freezing talks will allow Israel to formulate new requests for defense materials based on whether or not the deal is signed.
Based on the agreement signed between world powers and Iran, Israel will update its defense demands in order to maintain its security and defense superiority in the region.
Other Israeli defense officials have suggested though that Israel may decide to extend the freeze until early 2017, when a new US president is sworn into office.

Netanyahu and US President Barack Obama have publicly butted heads over each ones stance on Iran’s nuclear program. Netanyahu, a vocal advocate against the deal, has warned that the US and other world powers are only extending the breakout time of allowing Tehran to acquire a nuclear weapon.
Former Obama advisors were among a bipartisan group of 18 diplomats, experts and legislators who wrote an open letter to the president warning that the emerging nuclear deal does not address Israel’s security concerns.
The group stated that the deal “may fall short of meeting the administration’s own standard of a ‘good’ agreement” and that “the [current] agreement will not prevent Iran from having a nuclear weapons capability.”
“It will not require the dismantling of Iran’s nuclear enrichment infrastructure…It does not address Iran’s support for terrorist organizations (like Hezbollah and Hamas), its interventions in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and Yemen (its ‘regional hegemony’), its ballistic missile arsenal, or its oppression of its own people,” the letter stated.
Signatories of the letter include David Petraus, former director of the CIA; Dennis Ross, former special assistant to the president who was responsible for Israeli-Palestinian negotiations and Iran policy during Obama’s first term; General James Cartwright, who was the vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff from 2007-2011; Olli Heinonen, former deputy director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency; and Gary Samore, former arms control and weapons of mass destruction coordinator under Obama who now heads United Against a Nuclear Iran.

Read more at http://www.breakingisraelnews.com/44116/israel-suspends-defense-talks-us-pending-iran-deal-jerusalem/#oXAbhRjvtx8ZqwhK.99

Wednesday, November 27, 2013

Just When We Start Thinking That Obama Has Total Control Of The World, North Korea Is Busy Creating An EMP Bomb

North Korea Tests 'Super-EMP' Nuke

Thursday, 16 Jun 2011 09:05 AM
Share:
More . . .
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
Gary Samore, a top Obama administration national security official, warned of new sanctions if North Korea conducted a third round of nuclear tests on Monday, as reports surfaced that North Korea has miniaturized its nuclear warheads so they can be delivered by ballistic missile.

North Korea’s last round of tests, conducted in May 2009, appear to have included a “super-EMP” weapon, capable of emitting enough gamma rays to disable the electric power grid across most of the lower 48 states, says Dr. Peter Vincent Pry, a former CIA nuclear weapons analyst and president of EMPact America, a citizens lobbying group.

Samore, who handles arms control and non-proliferation issues, warned that “additional strong sanctions will be imposed on the North with the support of Russia and China."

North Korea’s nuclear tests have been dismissed as failures by some analysts because of their low explosive yield. But Dr. Pry believes they bore the “signature” of the Russian-designed “super-EMP” weapon, capable of emitting more gamma radiation than a 25-megaton nuclear weapon.

Pry believes the U.S. intelligence community was expecting North Korea to test a first generation implosion device with an explosive yield of 10 to 20 kilotons, similar to the bomb the U.S. exploded over Nagasaki in 1945. He said, “So when they saw one that put off just three kilotons, they said it failed. That is so implausible."

The technology for producing a first generation implosion weapon has been around since 1945, and is thoroughly described in open source literature.

South Korean defense minister, Kim Kwan-jin, told his country’s parliament on Monday that North Korea had succeeded in miniaturizing its nuclear weapons design, allowing them to place a nuclear warhead on a ballistic missile.

His analysis coincided with Congressional testimony in March by Lt. Gen. Ronald L. Burgess, director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, who stated that North Korea “may now have several plutonium-based warheads that it can deliver by ballistic missiles.”

The Soviet Union conducted an atmospheric test of an EMP weapon in 1962 over Kazakhstan whose pulse wave set on fire a power station 300 kilometers away and destroyed it within 10 seconds.

Such a weapon — equal to a massive solar flare such as the “solar maxima” predicted by NASA to occur in 2012 — poses “substantial risk to equipment and operation of the nation’s power grid and under extreme conditions could result in major long term electrical outages,” said Joseph McClelland of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in Senate testimony last month.

Pry said that a group of Russian nuclear weapons scientists approached him in 2004 when he served as staff director of the Commission to Assess the Threat to the United States from Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) Attack, to warn the United States that the technology to make that weapon “had leaked” to North Korea, and possibly to Iran.

“They told us that Russian scientists had gone to North Korea to work on building the super-EMP weapon,” Pry told Newsmax. “The North Koreans appear to have tested it in 2006 and again in 2009.”

North Korea’s main partner in its nuclear weapons and ballistic missile programs is Iran. Dr. William Graham, chairman of the Commission to Assess the Threat to the United States from Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) Attack, warned Congress three years ago that Iran had conducted missile launches in an EMP mode, detonating them high in the atmosphere.

Read more on Newsmax.com: "U.S. Intel: Iran Plans Nuclear Strike on U.S." 

Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., has introduced legislation known as the SHIELD Act that would require U.S. utilities to harden large transformers and other key elements of the nation’s power grid to protect them from a devastating EMP attack or a geomagnetic storm.

The House last year passed a similar measure by unanimous consent, but the bill died in the Senate, where Sen. Jeff Bingaman, D, N.M., and Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, the chair and ranking member of the Senate Energy Committee, insisted that the threat from cyberattack was more dangerous than the possibility of an EMP strike or a solar flare.

John Kappenman, the chief science adviser to the EMP commission, believes it would require just $1 billion to harden an estimated 5,000 power transformers around the country to shield them from the impact of an EMP-like event.

“We built this infrastructure without any awareness of this threat,” he told Newsmax. “We have no design code that takes this threat into account. We’ve been doing everything to design the grid to make it greatly more coupled, and therefore more vulnerable, to this threat.”

He compared the national power grid to a series of giant skyscrapers, “and only now we’ve discovered that it’s located on a big fault line.”

President Obama’s science adviser, John Holdren, warned in a March 10, 2011 Op-Ed co-authored with his British counterpart of the potentially catastrophic impact of a solar maxima event in the next 12 to 18 months.

“Space weather can affect human safety and economies anywhere on our vast wired planet, and blasts of electrically-charged gas traveling from the Sun at up to 5 million miles an hour can strike with little warning,” Holdren wrote. “Their impact could be big — on the order of $2 trillion during the first year in the United States alone, with a recovery period of 4 to 10 years.”

Rep. Trent Franks, who authored the SHIELD Act, warned of “catastrophic consequences” should Congress fail to act.

“The U.S. society and economy are so critically dependent upon the availability of electricity that a significant collapse of the grid, precipitated by a major natural or man-made EMP event, could result in catastrophic civilian casualties,” he said. “This vulnerability, if left unaddressed, could have grave, societal altering consequences.”


© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.