Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label Gohmert. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gohmert. Show all posts

Saturday, April 1, 2017

It Looks Like Republicans, Once Again, Are The Team That Can't Shoot Straight!!

  • Font Size
  •  
  • A
  •  
  • A
  •  
  • A
Print Images Print
Though the Freedom Caucus is under assault from all sides, some of its members who have spoken to the media or made public statements are standing strong — insisting that they are willing to work with President Trump to keep the GOP’s promise to repeal Obamacare.
The media has used the failure of the American Health Care Act — Republican leadership’s phony repeal bill — as an excuse to attack conservatives in Congress. The Tea Party members of the Freedom Caucus, who opposed the legislation on grounds that it would not improve the American health insurance market, have been labeled “hardliners” who are unwilling to “compromise” or “get things done.”
President Trump has expressed his frustration with the health insurance bill’s failure in a series of tweets, first suggesting that the Freedom Caucus saved Planned Parenthood funding and Obamacare, and later announcing that if conservatives don’t hop aboard the establishment Republican agenda they will be fought in 2018.
“The Freedom Caucus will hurt the entire Republican agenda if they don't get on the
 team, & fast. We must fight them, & Dems, in 2018!” the president tweeted.
Some members of the House Freedom Caucus are pushing back on President Donald 
Trump’s threat to “fight” conservatives in the 2018 midterm primary elections.
"It didn't take long for the swamp to drain [Trump]. No shame, Mr. President. Almost 
everyone succumbs to the D.C. Establishment," Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich.) tweeted. 
Freedom Caucus ally Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) also joined in.
So did Rep. Labrador:
Other Freedom Caucus conservatives are being less confrontational. Rep. Louie 
Gohmert (R-Texas) reiterated his support for “actual repeal” of Obamacare, and said
 he shared the president’s “frustration” with recalcitrant Republicans in Washington D.C.
"The Freedom Caucus is trying to change Washington. This bill keeps Washington
 the same, plain and simple," Rep. Jordan said on Fox News Thursday.
"We appreciate the president; we are trying to help the president. But the fact is, you
 have to look at the legislation. It doesn't do what we told the voters we were going to
 do, and the American people understand that. That's why only 17 percent of the
 population supports this legislation."
“We want to help the president get a bill that rises above 17% in the polling,”
 Congressman Dave Brat (R-Va.) told Conservative Review. He said the Freedom
 Caucus is looking for a bill that will lower premiums by repealing the insurance
 regulations and mandated health benefits that are driving up the cost of health
 insurance.
Brat also criticized the mainstream media narrative that the Freedom Caucus sunk
 Obamacare repeal. “The narrative by the elites and the D.C. cronies and the
 mainstream media is that ‘we can’t get to yes.’”
“On the facts that’s false,” Brat said. “We voted ‘yes’ 50 times for repeal. And the 
2015 bill was unanimous, basically, with Republicans in the House and the Senate.”
Rep. Brat argues that the Freedom Caucus has compromised from voting for that
 2015 full repeal of Obamacare to nearly supporting the American Health Care Act,
 “kind of an Obamacare federal structure that maintains the basic architecture of 
Obamacare.”
This is not what the conservative base in the Republican Party voted for in 2016. Then again, actually it is.
“The idea that we haven’t moved considerably is just laughable,” Brat said. 
Further, “it was clear to Leadership that more moderates were going to vote no if
 that bill came to the floor than the Freedom Caucus. But that narrative is not as 
convenient. Once that vote hit 22 ‘Noes’ it was going to go to 60 or 70, is the best
 estimate.”
Why then are moderates like Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Il.) claiming the Freedom
 Caucus killed Obamacare repeal? 
“They’re just being politically shrewd,” Brat said. “The mainstream media, of course,
 goes along with that narrative that it's these conservative guys’ fault. It’s the usual 
D.C. narrative.”
A narrative that President Trump has bought into. But Freedom Caucus conservatives 
aren’t the only ones making Brat’s point.
Congressman Tom Emmer (R-Minn.) — who is not a member of the Freedom Caucus 
— told PJ media that “there were probably ten to fifteen members of the Freedom
 Caucus that were still a no.” However, Emmer estimated that there were “two-thirds
 to three-quarters of the Freedom Caucus [who] were yes on this bill.” A “vast majority.”
This media narrative blaming the Freedom Caucus is “intentional,” Emmer said.
It always has been this way. You've got to marginalize the conservatives as 
much as possible. I think this is done both by liberals on the Left as much 
as liberals on the Right, Walter. The more you can marginalize this group,
 the less influence they can have, right?...
Marginalizing conservatives is exactly what the moderate Republicans in the Tuesday
 Group have decided to do. Rep. Chris Collins (R-N.Y.), who was the first member 
of Congress to endorse President Trump, told reporters today that the Freedom 
Caucus no longer has a seat at the table for negotiations on legislation.
These moderate Republicans refused to go along with a full repeal of Obamacare, 
and now they are pledging to work with liberal Democrats to pass bad bills rather than
 use the Republican majority to pass conservative legislation.
It’s compromise with Democrats. Screw the conservatives. Pass liberal legislation 
that will hurt people. And President Trump is fine with all of it.
This is not what the conservative base in the Republican Party voted for in 2016. 
Then again, actually it is. The Tea Party took this risk when they handed Trump the
 Republican nomination in 2016. Donald Trump was never a conservative. He was 
Some conservatives knew that when they held their nose to beat Hillary Clinton. 
Well, the Democrats are out of power and conservatives are still losing. So where
 do we go from here?

To get more exclusive content from CRTV, sign up here


Chris Pandolfo is a staff writer 
and type-shouter for Conservative Review. He holds a B.A. in Politics and Economics from Hillsdale College. His interests are Conservative Political Philosophy, the American Founding, and Progressive Rock. Follow
 him on Twitter for doom-saying and great album recommendations 
@ChrisCPandolfo
- See more at: https://www.conservativereview.com/commentary/2017/03/not-backing-down-freedom-caucus-stands-strong-amid-attacks-from-the-president#sthash.sXksTl2C.dpuf

Saturday, January 23, 2016

Cruz Is NOT A Compromiser So Establishment Believes They Can Get More From Trummp

  • Text smaller
  • Text bigger
Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas (Photo: Twitter)
Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas (Photo: Twitter)
It’s well known that many Republicans in Washington do not like Sen. Ted Cruz, but the full extent of that antipathy is coming to light this week as several current and former lawmakers say they prefer Donald Trump as the GOP nominee, although they have little regard for either man.
Some GOP consultants and strategists started the rumblings in recent days. Then Iowa Gov. Terry Branstad told Republicans in his state to oppose Cruz because of the senator’s opposition to ethanol subsidies.
But the story broke wide open on Wednesday when former Senate Majority Leader and 1996 Republican presidential nominee Bob Dole said he would choose Trump over Cruz, going so far as to say a Cruz nomination would be “cataclysmic” for the Republican Party. Another former GOP Senate leader, Trent Lott, has said the same.
But Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas, a Cruz supporter, is not swayed. While honoring Dole for his heroism in World War II, Gohmert told WND and Radio America many mainstream Republicans are worried about what a President Cruz would mean for them.
“You don’t get any more establishment than Bob Dole and Trent Lott,” Gohmert said. “So they’re going to be an indication of where the establishment will go. They have more belief that Trump will make deals with them and that Ted Cruz will continue to stand on principle, as he has been.”

Current officeholders are joining the chorus, including Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, and Dan Coats, R-Ind.
“An awful lot of us really didn’t like to be targeted as corrupt, establishment bought by the lobby establishment,” Coats told CNN. “It sure looks like someone was using it as a way to gain notoriety as the only true conservative in Washington.”
Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., went a step further, reportedly telling donors that he would vote for Bernie Sanders before he’d back Cruz. Burr later asked for a retraction, but the Associated Press is standing by the story.
Gohmert believes the venom in the GOP is a result of Ted Cruz doing something most other politicians don’t.
“If you’re a person that’s interested in lying or you’re interested in twisting the truth or you’re interested in breaking your promises that you made to get elected, then you’re not going to care for Ted Cruz,” Gohmert said.
Listen to the WND/Radio America interview with Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas:
But the congressman also said the notion that Capitol Hill is a wasteland of Trump supporters is dead wrong.
"Ted Cruz has got a bunch of members of Congress, solid conservatives, a whole bunch of them that have come out and endorsed Ted," he said. "I'm not aware of anybody in the House that has endorsed Trump."
Gohmert said moderate Republicans and the mainstream media are aligning with Trump based on a major assumption.
"They think he'll be more of a deal maker. They're probably figuring, 'You know, Trump is a winner. He says what he has to to win. He'll say what he has to to win the Republican primary,'" Gohmert explained. "And so they're probably thinking, 'So then he'll go back and agree with Democrats to say what he needs to to win the general election.'"
Gohmert said the Republicans are doomed in that scenario.
"If that were to happen, as has happened before, then so many in the base of the Republicans would have nowhere else to go but third party," he said. "That assures the Democrat wins."
But can Cruz work with people in Congress? Gohmert said yes.
"He can compromise," he said. "He has compromised on issues but when it comes to matters of principle, you shouldn't be compromising on matters of principle and he doesn't."
Copyright 2016 WND

Saturday, October 24, 2015

Will Ryan Win Enough Votes To Be Speaker?

Rep. Gohmert: 'Put Me in Crazy Category,' But I Won't Vote For Paul Ryan

 (Getty)
By Cathy Burke   |   Friday, 23 Oct 2015 08:29 PM
Texas Rep. Louie Gohmert is bucking fellow conservatives' support forfavored speaker of the House candidate Rep. Paul Ryan, tellingNewsmax TV the Wisconsin lawmaker's voting history is a "problem."

In an interview Friday on "The Steve Malzberg Show," Gohmert acknowledges his decision to not vote for Ryan "may put me in the crazy category for some people."


"But I analyzed the situation and I came out in support of [Florida GOP Rep.] Dan Webster not because he has a voting record as conservative as mine — because he doesn't," Gohmert said.

"But he is the only person I know who has been a speaker of the House and has done the almost unthinkable act of taking power away from himself and restoring it to the members."

Webster served as the first Republican speaker of the Florida House since Reconstruction before coming to Congress in 2010.

"It's only when the members of Congress are allowed to have authority and power that they can adequately represent their own constituents," Gohmert added. " We haven't had that authority under [outgoing Speaker of the House John] Boehner. Nobody could get a committee they wanted without his okay, or a chairmanship that they wanted without his okay."
Latest News Update

Gohmert compared that situation with a dictatorship.

"If we let our committees run themselves and let the members elect their own committee chairman, for example, and restore power back to the members instead of having a dictator — I mean let's face it, if we're going to have a dictator of the Republican Party, we've got to have somebody really incredibly good if they're going to make all the decisions for all of us who represent over 700,000 people," he said.

But Gohmert said that wasn't the main stumbling block for his decision to not vote for Ryan.

"My trouble is not with any of the promises that have been made, and it's certainly not with Paul's intellect or ability," he said, adding the issue is with "his history."

"As far as it appeared to me, he was the leading proponent for the Wall Street bailout in either party and either House, and I was trying to convince people not to vote for it and he was much more persuasive getting people to get on board," he said. "That's the problem."
In October 2008, the Democrat-controlled Congress approved a $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program; Ryan was among 91 Republicans who voted yes, according to fact-checker Politifact.

Ryan's vote earned him a demerit from the American Conservative Union, according to Politifact.
© 2015 Newsmax. All rights reserved.