Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label Hilary. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hilary. Show all posts

Sunday, May 7, 2017

If The FBI Has Evidence That Obama Was Rigging The Election, Let's See Some Charges



BOMBSHELL NYT Report: FBI Believed Obama Was Rigging U.S. Election!

A bombshell report has been 

released by the New York Times

and it provides shocking evidence

 that FBI Director James Comey

 was fully aware Obama’s administration was rigging the presidential election in favor of failed Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton.

The report reveals Comey reopened the investigation into Clinton’s use of a private email
server solely to uphold the credibility of the F.B.I., out of fear that Obama’s administration
was not supporting an independent, thorough investigation and he would be criticized for
 the unethical bias.

He anticipated Obama’s Attorney General Loretta Lynch would intentionally close the
investigation into Clinton’s email server before any true crimes were able to be revealed,
 based on an email obtained by Russian hackers and then intercepted by the F.B.I..
BOMBSHELL NYT Report: FBI Believed Obama was Rigging U.S. Election
“The document, which has been described as both a memo

and an email, was written by a Democratic operative who

expressed confidence that Ms. Lynch would keep the Clinton investigation from going too far, according to several former

officials familiar with the document,” The Times reported.

Based on the assumption that Clinton would win the election and Russian hackers
 would release the email, Comey reopened the investigation to cover their tracks.
But there was another investigation in the works that Comey did not reveal to the public.
The F.B.I. was also investigating then presidential nominee Donald Trump, but followed
 typical protocol of secrecy — likely due to the lack of political motivation hindering his
 investigation.
The investigation into Trump didn’t posses the potential public backlash that was plaguing
Clinton’s investigation.
Throughout the campaign, AG Lynch was anything but subtle in her cohorts with the
 Clintons.
She was caught privately meeting with Bill Clinton during the election, leading to
 raised suspicions that she was too familiar with the Clinton clan, and would not
support an independent, unbiased investigation.
Bill Clinton swore all he did was discuss grandkids as he met privately with then
 AG Loretta Lynch on a small plane on a Phoenix tarmac prior to the election, while
 Hillary was still under ‘investigation’ by the FBI prior to the election…yeah…right!
New evidence proves Loretta Lynch colluded with the Clintons to keep the Justice
Department from investigating Hillary ‘too closely’!
According to the Times, another document, hacked by the Russians, reveals collusion
between the former Attorney General and the Democrats to ensure Hillary Clinton’s
victory in the general election.
AG Lynch encouraged FBI Director Comey to refer to Clinton’s investigation as a
 “matter,” not an “investigation” and even revised a public statement from the
 Justice Department about the investigation to remove the word, “criminal.”
Mr. Comey’s defenders regard this as one of the untold stories of the Clinton
 investigation, one they say helps explain his decision-making.”
If a local news reporter in Phoenix had not reported that Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton
had met on that tarmac, she might have succeeded in sheltering Hillary even more
 effectively than she had.
The Times’ report further proves that Lynch and Obama’s administration were
tampering with the election to do everything in their power to ensure Clinton’s win,
and even Obama’s own F.B.I was onto them.
But even with all the clear tampering, Obama and Lynch still couldn’t beat Trump.
It’s time someone went to jail for this.

Sunday, October 30, 2016

What Would Happen If Hillary Is Indicted After She Wins? Can She Become President?

What Happens If A Presidential Candidate Withdraws ( or Dies) Before The Election Is Over?


http://undergroundworldnews.com
Let’s work backward in time. What happens if the winner of the election either dies or withdraws after Congress has counted the votes from the electoral college in January, but before the president-elect assumes office?
The first part is easy, if a president-elect dies before assuming office. The 20th Amendment resolves this problem directly: The vice president-elect becomes president.
Learn More:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/09/14/what-happens-if-a-u-s-presidential-candidate-withdraws-or-dies-before-the-election-is-over/
https://www.essentialdrugstore.com/
Rebelutionary Z:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdA8dXTjvomPtdOmFhq5hsw
https://twitter.com/Rebelutionary_Z
B Rich:
https://twitter.com/Brian_T33NO
https://www.youtube.com/c/BRichOfficial
Erick M:
https://twitter.com/letmeexplainit
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcwB6XtfJtyWW4DXKoZVn5A
ToBeFree:
https://twitter.com/da52true
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCvdTd5-p_sBE8oTjUOqPpPg
EnterThe5t4rz:
https://twitter.com/Enterthe5t4rz
https://www.youtube.com/user/Enterthe5t4rz
Save On Official DAHBOO7 Gear with Code “5off”
http://dahboo7.deco-street.com

Sunday, March 13, 2016

Foreign Affairs Has NOT Been A Major Topic Of Republicans



  • Text smaller
  • Text bigger
image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2016/03/GOP-debate-TW6.jpg
GOP presidential candidates Marco Rubio, Donald Trump, Ted Cruz and John Kasich (Photo: Twitter)
GOP presidential candidates Marco Rubio, Donald Trump, Ted Cruz and John Kasich (Photo: Twitter)
Former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton says there needs to be much for focus on national security issues by Republican presidential candidates to convince voters they are ready to be commander in chief and would be far better than Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders.
Virtually all of the Democratic Party debates have focused heavily on domestic issues, with the exception of the event that came just one day after the November terrorist attacks in Paris. Republicans had one debate devoted to national security, but most of the other encounters have also spent less time on foreign policy.
Bolton told WND and Radio America that’s a disservice to voters.
“There still hasn’t been enough discussion of the issue,” he said. “There has been, intermittently. I think consideration of terrorism, how to deal with ISIS and the expanding threat of radical Islam (has been discussed at length).
“I don’t really consider these debates. I consider them serial press conferences,” he added, in reference to the brief time given to answer questions and contrast positions.
He said the media should be doing a better job.
“The moderators should be asking more questions about it because the most important job of the president is to keep the country safe internationally,” he said. “We need to hear what the various candidates’ views are.”
Bolton said Republicans could build a big advantage by discussing national security issues more because Democrats are largely ignoring them.
“The people are going to be deprived of a real opportunity to judge among the candidates,” he said. “That’s why I have long argued that the Republican Party is, of the two parties, it’s the only one that’s the party of national security. If there’s no debate in the Republican Party, there’s not going to be a debate at all. I think that’s very dangerous for the country.”
Listen to the WND/Radio America interview with John Bolton:
While the position of the candidates is important, Bolton believes voters can get an important glimpse into how candidates approach a national security crisis by hearing them discuss issues now.
"It's not just their views on what China's doing in the South China Sea that threatens us or what Russia's doing in eastern Europe that threatens us. It's how people think about these issues," he said. "The next president is going to face threats and challenges that we can't even predict at the moment."
Bolton continued, "It's critical people have a way of judging their character, their integrity and their ability to deal with problems."
On top of that, Bolton stresses there are many critical issues facing the next president in addition to the fight against radical Islamic terrorism.
"Terrorism is the most imminent threat we face," he said. "But there are larger strategic threats from China in East Asia, from Russia in East Europe and others in this hemisphere, the Castro brothers and the mistakes President Obama has made opening relations with them, possibly giving the Guantanamo naval facility back to Cuba. There's a long list."
In Thursday's debate, the biggest international flash-point was over how the president should approach the Middle East peace process. Donald Trump said he is very pro-Israel but would approach talks in an impartial way. Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio say they would stand with Israel ,and John Kasich believes the peace process is largely a waste of time right now.
Bolton said the U.S. must stand with Israel or else no one else will, although he says given all the other problems in the Middle East, he does not expect the next president to address the Israeli-Palestinian question anytime soon.
Bolton briefly flirted with a 2016 bid of his own to keep the focus on foreign policy. Instead, he says he is in communication with multiple candidates and provides feedback on their ideas for a wide range of issues.
He is not endorsing anyone at this time, but Bolton is perfectly willing to sound the alarm as to why Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders should not be commander in chief.
When it comes to Clinton, he said her entire time at the State Department is a red flag to the nation, especially after the disastrous response in Benghazi.
"It's just a dereliction of duty, really, to see your people in danger, not just in Libya but potentially all around the Middle East, and to go home," he said. "It sends a signal within the bureaucracy that the secretary doesn't care enough to stay at her desk, late at night if need be, until all Americans are accounted for."
He also said Hillary's handling of State Department email on an unsecured, private server also depicts a troubling lack of judgment.
In Wednesday's Democratic debate, Bernie Sanders came under fire for comments he made in 1985 suggesting the Cuban people weren't all that upset with the Castro regime. When asked to clarify his current position, Sanders lamented that Cuba remains an authoritarian state but also lauded its work in education and health care.
Bolton was horrified.
"It shows what an astoundingly left-wing radical this man still is at an age when common sense normally begins to descend on people," said Bolton, while slamming the Obama administration for getting nothing in exchange for opening diplomatic relations with Cuba.
Copyright 2016 WND

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/03/bolton-gop-forgetting-1-critical-issue-in-debates/#qTHAZWtbt0kvzCiW.99