It is ironic that when a public servant such as a governor makes unpopular and tough decisions, they are generally blamed by the media. However, many times the public is more intelligent and recognizes that the right decisions were made and rewards the "rebel" office holder with another term.
This will be the result of Michigan's governor, Rick Snyder. His decisions on the emergency manager and right to work legislation are examples of correct decisions. Both of these will change the nature of Michigan for the better. He is not your normal politician rather he is a leader who happens to be our Governor.
He will face a challenge, most likely from low power Democrat. We expect that the Governor will win re-election.
Conservative Tom
Michigan's Snyder Made Tough Decisions, Now Faces Re-election Fight
Wednesday, 24 Jul 2013 10:41 PM
Less than three years after the former high-tech executive came out of nowhere to defeat four seasoned officeholders in the Republican primary and then win the governorship in a landslide, Snyder now inarguably is a national political figure.
Throughout the weekend, the 55-year-old governor was featured on CBS's "Face the Nation" and other national news outlets explaining how Detroit's near-$16 billion in unfunded liabilities made his decision to seek bankruptcy inevitable.
There even has been mention of Snyder as a candidate for the Republican nomination for president in 2016, although even admirers of the governor admit he first must win what is shaping up as a hard-fought battle for re-election in 2014.
Even before Detroit's bankruptcy filing, Snyder had overseen controversial policy decisions which made him both a hero to conservatives nationwide and an archenemy of public-sector unions.
In a 2012 interview with this reporter, Snyder recalled the situation he faced upon succeeding two-term Democratic Gov. Jennifer Granholm in January 2011.
"We had a terrible last decade," he said. "We were ranked 16th in per-capita income in 2000 and we dropped to 36th in 2010."
In his initial budget, Snyder enacted a series of pro-growth measures and restrained state-government spending. Snyder's budget, passed by the Republican-controlled state Legislature, slashed $1.8 billion in spending and eliminated the state's complicated business tax in favor of a flat tax.
Those actions have paid off, as the state's economy has begun to recover from the depths of the 2008 recession.
When Snyder took office in 2011, the state's unemployment rate was 10.7 percent, and by June of 2013, the rate had fallen to 8.7 percent. The state has seen a $1.5 billion budget deficit turn into a $400 million budget surplus in 2013.
But in the past year, Snyder engaged in several high-profile battles, overseeing the taxing of pensions for retired state employees living in the state and signing a measure giving more power to emergency managers of localities — a move which made possible Detroit's bankruptcy filing — after an earlier version of the law was rejected in a voter initiative.
But by far, Snyder's most controversial move came last December, when he made union bastion Michigan the 24th state to become a right-to-work state.
A day after signing legislation that made union dues voluntary, Snyder told this reporter: "It's exciting. Not only is it about more and better jobs, but it's also an important philosophical point. It's pro-worker, giving workers the freedom to choose."
Snyder says he prefers the term "freedom to choose" over "right-to-work" to describe the law.
AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka said there have been two recent major assaults on unions —Snyder's efforts in Michigan and Wisconsin's Gov. Scott Walker's reforms requiring some public employees to pay a portion of their pension and health benefits.
So it is no surprise that Michigan's governor has become a top target of organized labor.
According to the most recent Public Policy Polling survey of likely Michigan voters, Snyder trails former congressman and likely Democratic nominee Mark Schauer by a margin of 42 percent to 38 percent.
Some political experts see a chance of Snyder — if he is re-elected — becoming a Republican presidential hopeful in 2016.
Assessing Snyder as a potential presidential hopeful, Terry Madonna, Franklin and Marshall College professor and Pennsylvania's leading political pollster, told Newsmax: "I watched quite a lot of him over the weekend as he explained the Detroit bankruptcy. I was impressed . He sounded savvy. And he might just play in an industrial state like Pennsylvania, as it is similar to Michigan. It's just too early to tell."
Bill Ballenger, editor of the much-read "Inside Michigan Politics," said there "has been speculation about a Snyder [presidential] bid raised recently. And, as a businessman and first-time officeholder, he is an unorthodox, unusual figure. In a Republican Party that is increasingly conservative, his stands on public-employee pensions, right-to-work, and now Detroit are popular."
But, Ballenger quickly added, "Realistically, I rate his chances as near zero. But he also has some problems with the conservative bases. These include his call for Medicaid expansion — which has set up a real clash between the governor and the Republican leaders in the state Senate — and his call for a taxpayer-funded 'Bridge to Canada.' This is really upsetting to the tea party here."
Although Snyder has signed pro-life legislation into law, Ballenger and other Michigan observers note that he rarely discusses cultural issues and is not close to his state's pro-family activists.
"At present, Snyder would only be numbered on a list of long shots, but he is an intriguing long-shot," historian David Pietrusza, author of three best-selling books on presidential elections, told Newsmax.
"Although a governor and a Michigan-born corporate-type like Mitt Romney, Snyder can point to a more conservative tenure and a far less patrician background," Pietrusza said. "He seems to be a planner, quite steady and long-range in his moves, as witnessed by his having already made the obligatory foreign visits to Afghanistan and Israel."
"Unions will hate him," Pietrusza said, "but then again, they will hate any Republican worth nominating. His potential to swing Michigan into the GOP is a plus. The Detroit situation remains a question mark."
For his part, Snyder and his top staff dismiss any queries about a bid for national office and insist he wants only to remain in his present job in Lansing.
As he told this reporter in December, "Tell the people that I'm happy being governor, but I appreciate those kind thoughts."
John Gizzi is chief political columnist and White House correspondent for Newsmax.
© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/John-Gizzi/Snyder-re-election-Michigan-Gizzi/2013/07/24/id/516751?s=al&promo_code=144D1-1#ixzz2a5hh3MqE
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!
The emergency manger's bankruptcy filing has been blocked by court order. They cannot override the Michigan state constitution. The order states…
ReplyDelete"The Governor is prohibited by Article IX Section 24 of the Michigan Constitution from authorizing an emergency manager under PA 436 to proceed under Chaper 9 in a manner which threatens to diminish or impair accrued pension benefits, and any such action by the Governor is without authority and in violation of Article IX Section 24 of the Michigan Constitution."
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/07/19/us-usa-detroit-ruling-idUSBRE96I11220130719
Quoting the Michigan Constitution…
"§ 24 Public pension plans and retirement systems, obligation.
Sec. 24.
The accrued financial benefits of each pension plan and retirement system of the state and its political subdivisions shall be a contractual obligation thereof which shall not be diminished or impaired thereby.
Financial benefits arising on account of service rendered in each fiscal year shall be funded during that year and such funding shall not be used for financing unfunded accrued liabilities."
Tom, I believe you consider yourself a "strict constructionist" when interpreting the powers of the executive branch. I have read closely Article V of the Michigan Constitution. I see absolutely nothing there that grants the Governor the power to appoint a city manager to displace the duly-elected mayor and city council, seize total control of the city government and yet remain 100% unaccountable to the voters of the city. A city does not need such a DICTATOR to file for bankruptcy. Stockton, CA and 30+ other cities in the U.S. have done it without the Governor usurping the authority of the city's elected officials.
As you undoubtedly know, the voters of Michigan did a statewide referendum on the emergency manager law and REJECTED it. What did Snyder and Republican legislature do when the voters spoke? They came out with a new version of the law that is immune to voter referendum! The city manager and the law that created his dictatorship are both immune to the democratic process. But if the voters can't stop them, hopefully the courts will. Michigan voters can get rid of Snyder and recall Republican legislators, but not these laws.
--David
It is obvious that you don't know the financial mess Michigan was in after 8 years of Governor Granholm. Snyder has turned the state around and now has a budget surplus. BTW, it does not relate to the Big Three either.
ReplyDeleteThe emergency manager law is very necessary to help prevent cities from going into bankruptcy, which Detroit finally had to do. The situation was drastic and in those times drastic matters are necessary.
Now under bankruptcy, a judge (in your words DICTATOR) will decide what happens. Whereas the EM had to report to the Governor and therefore had some political responsibility, the bankruptcy judge reports to no one.
The unions, bond holders and other stake holders would not make a deal with the EM, so there was no option. Detroit owes over 18 billion dollars and has NO way of paying it back. Unfortunately, it will be the small people who get hurt but I do not see any other way of solving the issue.
BTW, we do not agree with Snyder on everything. He has proposed a new international crossing--a bridge--which will not improve access and will be paid for by the taxpayers. He says it will be paid for by fees, however, current traffic on the existing bridges and tunnel are way under capacity and adding another crossing will not be profitable enough to pay for itself.
Red herring. Nobody disputes that the bankruptcy is necessary. However, it should be administered by the elected officials (as in Stockton and many other cities), not by a hand-picked DICTATOR appointed by the governor.
ReplyDeleteThe EM law is undemocratic and unconstitutional under the Michigan Constitution. The judge was simply reading the Michigan constitution and making the correct ruling. I wanted your analysis of the constitutional standing of the EM law (read Article V of Michigan constitution) and the violation of Article 9, section 24 by Orr's bankruptcy filing.
--David
Regarding Granholm…
ReplyDeleteShe cut spending more than any governor in the country….
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2011/aug/04/jennifer-granholm/jennifer-granholm-says-massive-government-cuts-mic/
Maybe too much at the wrong time? As the article states, the difference when trying to generalize her analysis to the federal level is that the state of Michigan does not have a Bernanke to issue money into the state's economy.
--David