Liberals’ Double Standard
on Bathrooms, Boycotts,
and Religious Freedom
If it wasn’t for double standards, some
liberals would have none at all. That
seems to be the lesson from the past
few weeks, where liberals have
displayed three distinct forms of hypocrisy.
Liberal governors and mayors signed
travel bans to North Carolina and
Mississippi, CEOs of major corporations
pledged boycotts and relocations,
and Bruce Springsteen and Bryan
Adams have canceled scheduled
concerts in those states.
>>> For More on This, See Ryan
T. Anderson’s New Book, “Truth
At issue are a Mississippi law that
narrowly and carefully protects the
rights of religious charities, small
businesses, and select public servants
and a North Carolina law that reasonably
protects privacy and safety in public
restrooms, while leaving private
institutions free to set their own
bathroom policies. These laws,
apparently, are now unacceptable
to some voices on the left.
The Daily Signal is the multimedia news organization of The Heritage Foundation. We’ll respect your inbox and keep you informed.
But are they
really? The hypocrisy in their opposition
suggests otherwise.
- Big Money and Big Business
- in Politics Are Bad, Unless
- They Support the Left?
Liberals decry the influence of big business
and big money in politics. They denounce,
as a direct threat to democracy, the ability
of corporations to engage in issue
advocacy. They argue that politicians
must answer to the people, not the
highest corporate bidder.
Or at least that’s what they used to say.
Liberals are now cheering Apple, PayPal,
Salesforce, and countless other giant
corporations threatening legislators and
governors with boycotts if they pass
popular laws that the left disapproves of.
These corporate elites didn’t win an
argument about good public policy.
Instead, they threatened to boycott
and transfer jobs out of states if the
politicians didn’t do as they insisted.
This economic coercion is a form of
cronyism—cultural cronyism. Big
businesses use their outsized market
share to pressure government to do their
bidding at the expense of the will of the
people and the common good. And,
hypocritically, the left cheers it on.
- Bruce Springsteen and Bryan
- Adams Get to Follow Their
- Consciences, but the Baker
- and Florist Don’t?
Many of us think that what these
corporate giants are doing is bad for
representative democracy and
self-government. But they have a
right to do it. And yet, they want to
deny the rights of bakers, florists,
photographers, adoption agencies,
and marriage counselors who only
want the same liberty to follow their
conscience.
Big business is using its market freedom
to deny small businesses and charities
their religious freedom. The hypocrisy
is astounding.
Take the cases of Bruce Springsteen
and Bryan Adams. They said their
consciences require them to deny
their artistic gifts and talents to citizens
of states that have enacted policy they
disagreed with. And, of course, they
have that right.
Adams wrote: “I cannot in good
conscience perform in a state where
certain people are being denied their
civil rights.”
He’s wrong about the laws—they
don’t deny anyone civil rights. Instead,
they protect civil rights. They protect
religious freedom, which, as the liberal
American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)
once acknowledged, is a civil liberty.
So Springsteen and Adams are
exercising their freedom of conscience
by boycotting states that sought to
protect the consciences of adoption
agencies, religious schools, bakers,
and florists. Do they not see the hypocrisy?
- North Carolina and Mississippi
- Are Human Rights Violators,
- but Singapore and Cuba Are Great?
Finally, if these boycotts are really a
matter of principle—and not just
grandstanding—then why do so many
of these same companies do business
in foreign countries with terrible records
on human rights in general, and for
LGBT people in particular?
The governor of North Carolina, Pat
McCrory, pointed out this hypocrisy.
After New York Governor Andrew
Cuomo issued a travel ban for state
employees to North Carolina, Gov.
McCrory asked how it was consistent
with Gov. Cuomo’s trip to Cuba—with
state business leaders—to promote
trade with that country.
Is Cuba better on human rights than
North Carolina? Or is Cuomo being
a bit hypocritical?
Others have pointed out the hypocrisy
of PayPal. The CEO of PayPal announced
that the company wouldn’t expand in
North Carolina because of “PayPal’s
deepest values and our strong belief
that every person has the right to be
treated equally, and with dignity and
respect.”
Really?
Then PayPal might want to explain why
its international headquarters are in
Singapore, where people engaged in
private consensual same-sex acts
can face two years in jail. It might also
want to explain why it announced in
2012 that it would open offices in the
United Arab Emirates (UAE). While
North Carolina placed some
commonsense limits on public
bathrooms, the UAE reportedly jails
What’s Next?
The left knows it can’t win on the merits
in the debate about religious freedom
and bathroom privacy. These bills enjoy
strong public support—that’s why elected
representatives are voting to pass them.
And it’s why corporate elites have to
a religious freedom bill, and we can
expect the same cast of characters to
come out in opposition. But this time,
the left and big business are entering
the debate with one big disadvantage—
they’ve been beaten. Gov. Phil Bryant
of Mississippi and Gov. Pat McCrory
of North Carolina have stood up to the
bullies and shattered their aura of
invincibility.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for commenting. Your comments are needed for helping to improve the discussion.