Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label Huma Abedin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Huma Abedin. Show all posts

Sunday, November 6, 2016

Who Is Huma? Should We Be Concerned That She Is So Close To Hillary?

Huma Abedin is Hillary's closest associate so what does it mean when you look at her history. It means a lot.  Take a look at this video and ask yourself if you feel comfortable having Huma in the White House?

Conservative Tom

Here is the link:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXG_h765ZBA&feature=youtu.be

Tuesday, August 23, 2016

Incompetent, Irresponsible And Outright Punishable Actions Taken By Huma Abedin. She Does Not Care As She Is A Member Of Muslim Brotherhood!

Leaked Emails Reveal Stunning

 Incompetence of Team Hillary

3 3 0  7
Special: Melissa McCarthy Uses New Skinny Pill to Drop 50lbs in 35 Days
image: http://engine.newsmaxfeednetwork.com/i.gif?e=eyJhdiI6MTE4ODk4LCJhdCI6MTMsImJ0IjozLCJjbSI6NDczNTEwLCJjaCI6MTc4NDEsImNrIjp7fSwiY3IiOjE0MzY4OTcsImRpIjoiOWYxYjQ0MWRmYTQ3NGE1NWFiYjAxMzg4NjYyMzQ1ZDUiLCJkbSI6MSwiZmMiOjE5MzUyMzIsImZsIjoyMTYxMTMxLCJpcCI6IjEwNC4xMzcuMjI1Ljc2Iiwia3ciOiJhZ2U8MjAsYWdlMjAtNDAsYWdlNDAsYWdlNjAsYWdlPjYwLGJvdGgsZmVtYWxlLG1hbGUsYXBvbGl0aWNhbCxjb25zZXJ2YXRpdmUsZGVtb2NyYXRpYyxyZXB1YmxpY2FuLGZpbmFuY2UscG9saXRpY2FsLGhlYWx0aCxlbnRlcnRhaW5tZW50LHNwb3J0cyxkaWN0aW9uYXJ5LGluY29tZWxvdyxpbmNvbWVtaWQsaW5jb21laGlnaCxpbmNvbWUtYWxsLGluY29tZS1taWRkbGVjbGFzcyxpbmNvbWUtYWZmbHVlbnQscmVsaWdpb3VzLG5vbnJlbGlnaW91cyxjaHJpc3RpYW4samV3aXNoLG90aGVyLG5ld3MsY29uc2VydmF0aXZlLGdvcCxyZXB1YmxpY2FuLHJlYWdhbix0ZWEgcGFydHkscmlnaHQgd2luZyIsIm53Ijo5NjUwLCJwYyI6MC41MiwiZWMiOjAuMzUsInByIjo2MTI3NSwicnQiOjMsInN0Ijo0Mzg5NTksInVrIjoidWUxLTcxMGM1NDI1ZjU2MzQ1OGJiNGUzZWRjMGI4ZGY5ODk2Iiwiem4iOjEzMzczMiwidHMiOjE0NzE5NTkyNDI2MjgsImJmIjp0cnVlLCJwbiI6ImF6azM5MjAxIiwiYmEiOjc2LCJmcSI6MH0&s=AqmvGnXjyGppvCOp2n3_DrqheFw
Emails released on Monday show that Hillary Clinton’s top State Department
 aide, Huma Abedin, left classified government information that needed to be
 burned in the front seat of her vehicle.

“Favor” is the subject of Abedin’s July 20, 2009 email to Lauren Jiloty, Clinton’s
 personal assistant. Judicial Watch obtained the records and hundreds more 
pages of Abedin emails as part of its ongoing Freedom of Information Act
 lawsuit against the State Department.

“I’m going to have ambassador ride on next drive,” wrote Abedin. “There’s 
a bunch of burn stuff in the pocket of my front seat.”

And seemingly realizing the significance of her error, Abedin asked Jiloty to
 move the documents to a more secure location.

Read more at http://americanactionnews.com/articles/leaked-emails-reveal-stunning-incompetence-of-team-hillary#Mmq4g8sLbsoRkRCb.99

Tuesday, June 7, 2016

The Clinton Lies Just Keep On Coming

Screen Shot 2016-06-02 at 8.51.38 PM

Why Judge Napolitano Believes Clinton’s Top Aide Gave Devastating Answer During Deposition

Judge Andre Napolitano went on Fox News the other day and pointed out what he feels is a devastating admission from Hillary Clinton’s top aide Cheryl Mills. The admission came during a recent deposition from a lawsuit launched by Judicial Watch.
According to The Blaze:
Napolitano noted Wednesday on Fox’s “America’s Newsroom” that Cheryl Mills, whose recent deposition was made public Tuesday, spoke about who would have had access to Clinton’s account should an email need to be released as part of a FOIA request.
From the transcript, released by Judicial Watch:
Attorney: Okay. Did they have access to the Secretary’s e-mail account so they could search her e-mails in response to the FOIA request?
Mills: To my knowledge, they did not have access to her e-mail account. To my knowledge, the information where her e-mail was — if there was a topic that would have been related, would have been in the communications that she would have either had on paper, communications that she would have had in other materials that she received, or in exchanges that she had with e-mail with individuals on their State account.
Napolitano called the response “devastating” for Clinton, questioning whether Mills and her lawyers really “thought through” that answer.
“It means that Mrs. Clinton, Cheryl Mills and Bryan Pagliano, who’s the next person to be deposed in this case — if he even answers any questions — engaged in a conspiracy to frustrate the operations of the State Department,” he said, noting that the agency is required by law to preserve records so that they may be accessible for FOIA requests.
The published deposition reveals that Mills’ lawyers repeatedly objected to questions on IT specialist Bryan Pagliano’s role in setting Clinton up with the server.
The Fox News senior judicial analyst added that people can be prosecuted if they “conspire to frustrate the operations of the government” and suggested that Clinton created the server with the specific intention of avoiding FOIA requests and used the same setup during her eight-year stint as a U.S. senator for New York.
“She feared the president, the rest of the State Department and the public knowing what she was doing,” Napolitano said.
It’s interesting that Ms. Mills made such an admission. It appears even the most polished at deception make mistakes and Ms. Mills admission is clearly a mistake.
The question becomes, with so much damaging evidence against Hillary – just of what has been leaked – will the FBI recommend, and will Loretta Lynch Justice Department indict Hillary Clinton for her crimes.
It’s wishful thinking that they will. Only time will tell.

Tuesday, May 24, 2016

Is The AP Covering For Hillary Or Is She In Legal Jeopardy?

Clinton Email Probe in Late Stage, FBI May Question Her

Image: Clinton Email Probe in Late Stage, FBI May Question Her
Monday, 23 May 2016 02:44 PM
FBI agents probing whether Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server imperiled government secrets appear close to completing their work, a process experts say will probably culminate in a sit-down with the former secretary of state.
The FBI has already spoken with Huma Abedin, a Clinton confidant who was among the Democratic presidential front runner's closest aides at the State Department. Former chief of staff Cheryl D. Mills is also cooperating with the investigation, according to her lawyer.
That signals that agents will probably seek to interview Clinton soon, if they haven't already, former Justice Department officials told The Associated Press. The FBI's standard practice is to save questioning the person at the center of an investigation for last, once it has gathered available facts from others.
"With a person like Secretary Clinton, the FBI probably assumes they are going to get one chance to interview her, not only because she is a prominent person but because she is very busy right now with the presidential campaign," said David Deitch, a former Justice Department prosecutor. "It makes sense they would defer interviewing her until late in their investigation."
On CBS's "Face the Nation" on May 8, Clinton said the FBI had not yet reached out to her, but she was "more than ready to talk to anybody, anytime."
"I hope that this is close to being wrapped up," she said.
Clinton has good reasons to want the FBI to close its investigation soon. She has been dogged by questions about her email practices for more than a year, since AP revealed that the clintonemail.com server was in the basement of Clinton's New York home while she served as the nation's top diplomat from 2009 to 2013.
Clinton has acknowledged in the campaign that her homebrew email setup was a mistake, but said she never sent or received anything marked classified at the time.
FBI Director James Comey said this month he is keeping close tabs on the investigation to ensure it's conducted properly and completed promptly. However, he added there is no timeline for completing the probe tied to events on the political calendar, such as the 2016 Democratic National Convention in late July.
Republicans want to keep the issue alive through the November presidential election, alleging that she put national security at risk.
"Clinton's irresponsible behavior as secretary of state and her deliberate attempts to mislead the American people show she lacks the judgment and character to be president," Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus said this month.
Latest News Update
In addition to the FBI investigation, inspectors general at the State Department and the U.S. intelligence community are reviewing whether security procedures or laws were broken. At least three dozen civil lawsuits have been filed, including one by the AP, over public records requests related to Clinton's time as secretary.

A federal judge recently approved a request from the conservative legal advocacy group Judicial Watch to question Clinton's aides under oath in a series of depositions scheduled through the end of June. U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan also said he may require Clinton herself to testify, depending on what information comes to light.
The State Department has so far released more than 52,000 pages of Clinton's work-related emails, including some that were censored because they contained information considered sensitive to national security. Thousands of additional emails were withheld by Clinton, whose lawyers said they contained personal messages unrelated to her government service.
Critics have questioned whether Clinton's server might have made a tempting target for hackers, especially those working with or for foreign intelligence services.
A Romanian computer hacker now in U.S. custody, Marcel Lazar, has boasted that he breached Clinton's home server three years ago. However, Lazar, who went online by the name Guccifer, has provided no evidence to back up his claim. Also, Lazar's expertise was hacking into the email accounts of politicians and celebrities who used free commercial services, not breaking into a stand-alone email server.
Legal experts have said it appears unlikely Clinton would be charged with committing a crime. The relatively few U.S. laws that govern the handling of classified materials were generally written to cover spies and leakers. Lawyers who specialize in national security say it would be a stretch to apply these statutes to a former cabinet secretary whose communication of sensitive materials was with aides — not a national enemy.
The Justice Department also does not appear to have convened a grand jury to examine Clinton's email use, a likely step if prosecutors were weighing felony criminal charges.
Lansing Woo, a retired FBI official who supervised counterintelligence investigations in the Los Angeles field office, said the recent interviews of Clinton's aides appear to follow standard procedure.
"You start at the periphery of the circle," Woo said. By the time investigators move from far-removed witnesses to the person they most want to speak with, "they're already going to know what's what, who's who, who did what, and they're going to then ask the questions around that," he said.
But Deitch, now in private practice, stressed that just because investigators may seek to interview Clinton does not necessarily mean she is in legal jeopardy.
"As a defense attorney, I have had many cases where targets of an investigation were interviewed and no indictment was ever forthcoming," Deitch said. "It's just part of the process."
© Copyright 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


Breaking News at Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/US-Clinton-Email/2016/05/23/id/730253/#ixzz49a1DgkpT
Urgent: Rate Obama on His Job Performance. Vote Here Now!

Wednesday, May 4, 2016

Are The Wolves Closing In On Their Prey?

Federal judge opens the door to Clinton deposition in email case

3.8K6
 4508
A federal judge on Wednesday opened the door to interviewing Democratic presidential front-runnerHillary Clinton as part of a review into her use of a private email server while secretary of State.
Judge Emmet Sullivan of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia laid out the ground rules for interviewing multiple State Department officials about the emails, with an eye toward finishing the depositions in the weeks before the party nominating conventions.
Clinton herself may be forced to answer questions under oath, Sullivan said, though she is not yet being forced to take that step.
“Based on information learned during discovery, the deposition of Mrs. Clinton may be necessary,” Sullivan said in an order on Wednesday. [READ THE ORDER BELOW] Discovery is the formal name for the evidence-gathering process, which includes depositions.
“If plaintiff believes Mrs. Clinton’s testimony is required, it will request permission from the Court at the appropriate time.”
The order, which came in the course of a lawsuit from conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch, leaves open the possibility that Clinton will be forced to answer detailed questions on the eve of her formal selection as the Democratic presidential nominee about her creation of the server.
Any deposition would surely roil the presidential race and force her campaign to confront the issue, which has dogged her for a year.
“Her legal team is really going to fight that really hard,” predicted Matthew Whitaker, a former U.S. attorney who has raised questions about Clinton’s email setup.
“You have to take her deposition in this case to fully understand how it was designed and the whys and the what-fors.”
While leaving the door open to Clinton’s eventual deposition, Sullivan on Wednesday ordered at least six current and former State Department employees to answer questions from Judicial Watch, which has filed multiple lawsuits over the Clinton email case.
That list includes longtime Clinton aide Huma Abedin, former chief of staff Cheryl Mills, under secretary for management Patrick Kennedy, former executive secretary Stephen Mull and Bryan Pagliano, the IT official believed to be responsible for setting up and maintaining the server.
The judge also ordered the State Department to prepare a formal answer about Clinton’s emails. Donald Reid, a senior security official, may also be asked to answer questions, if Judicial Watch so decides.
That process is scheduled to be wrapped up within eight weeks, putting the deadline in the final week of June.
Judicial Watch brought suit against the State Department under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) in an effort to bring Abedin’s emails to light. The lawsuit has since evolved into a battleground over Clinton’s use of the private server.
Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton called Wednesday’s order “a significant victory for transparency and accountability,” and promised that it would shine a light on Clinton’s email practices.
“Judicial Watch will use this discovery to get all of the facts behind Hillary Clinton’s and the Obama State Department’s thwarting of FOIA so that the public can be sure that all of the emails from her illicit email system are reviewed and released to the public as the law requires,” he said in a statement.
Clinton’s Republican critics have repeatedly accused her of setting up the private server and then deleting roughly half its contents to evade public scrutiny. In the process, her critics say, Clinton may have made government secrets vulnerable to hackers.
The FBI and government inspectors general are conducting separate investigations related to the server, and the prospect that classified information might have been mishandled.
Clinton has said that she has yet to be contacted by the FBI to set up an interview as part of its investigation, despite long speculation that she will be. 
But any deposition in the Judicial Watch case could frustrate that process for Clinton’s camp.
“You only want your client to tell their story once if at all,” said Whitaker, the executive director of a separate watchdog group called the Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust. “If you’re going to stake out some ground in a deposition which is under oath, that’s really a dangerous opportunity to lay out a story that you say is true under penalty of perjury and then it might be used against you, ultimately, if you have to take the stand again.”
In his order, Sullivan pointed to revelations from the emails appearing to show officials trying to evade demands of FOIA.
In one email, for instance, Mull told Abedin that Clinton’s emails “would be subject to FOIA requests” if she used a department-issued BlackBerry, even though her identity would remain secret.
Abedin responded that the idea “doesn’t make a whole lot of sense.”
In February, Sullivan ruled that the evidence-gathering process could proceed, and the two sides have been haggling since then.
Sullivan had previously suggested that Clinton could be forced to respond to questions, but his order on Wednesday offered the clearest indication that it remains a real possibility.
In his order on Wednesday, Sullivan denied the organization’s efforts to combine his granting of depositions and a similar decision by another judge in a separate case.
--This report was updated at 5:13 p.m.

Monday, March 28, 2016

Hillary's Indictment Will Come Before The Democratic Convention, If Not, She Probably Will Not Be Charged.

147 FBI Agents Probing If Hillary 'Committed Crime'

Image: 147 FBI Agents Probing If Hillary 'Committed Crime'
By Joe Crowe   |   Monday, 28 Mar 2016 09:52 AM
One hundred and forty-seven FBI agents are part of the investigation into Hillary Clinton's emails, said a lawmaker who'd been briefed by FBI Director James B. Comey, reports The Washington Post.

The FBI is hurrying to avoid announcing any action in the case too close to the presidential election, the report said.

Clinton and her staff were "dedicated addicts" of the BlackBerry device during her tenure as secretary of state, but the device was vulnerable to hacking, reported the Post.
Part of the issue revolves around the officials' attempts to allow Clinton to continue to use the BlackBerry and her personal email account for work.

While Clinton aides and government officials looked into ways to allow her to continue to use the BlackBerry, Clinton continued using it. Officials claim they did not know that it was tied to a personal email server at the Clinton family home in Chappaqua, N.Y., so they did not protect the server against spying, said the Post.

In March 2009, assistant secretary for diplomatic security Eric Boswell sent a memo that said "any unclassified BlackBerry is highly vulnerable in any setting to remotely and covertly monitoring conversations, retrieving e-mails and exploiting calendars."
Latest News Update

Boswell that she read his memo and "gets it." Then she continued to use her BlackBerry, reported the Post.

The case has perplexed many. Judge Emmet G. Sullivan of the U.S. District Court in Washington is presiding over one of the Freedom of Information Act lawsuits in the case.

He said in a hearing Feb. 23, "Am I missing something? How in the world could this happen?"

The private server's logs have shown no evidence of hacking, according to Clinton officials. Clinton aide Bryan Pagliano, who maintained the server, cooperated with the Justice Department investigation in exchange for immunity.

Experts interviewed for the Post story said Clinton's efforts to keep emails secure were not up to par with federal regulations.

The FBI is setting up interviews with a number of Hillary Clinton's aides as part of its investigation, reports The Los Angeles Times. 
Democratic primary voters have "largely dismissed" the issue, said Democratic pollster Mark Mellman and it is a well-known part of the campaign, "baked into the cake for the general electorate."
© 2016 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


Breaking News at Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Hillary-email-scandal-FBI/2016/03/28/id/721143/#ixzz44EUdtIPC