Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label Terri Lynn Land. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Terri Lynn Land. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 8, 2014

Islamists Support Their Candidates With Political Contributions. CAIR Makes Big Contributions.

André Carson, Islamist Choice for the House of Representatives

by Daniel Pipes
National Review Online
October 7, 2014
  Be the first of your friends to like this.
In politics, the adage goes, follow the money. And so, data abound for contributions from trial lawyers, insurance brokers, and even optometrists.
But what about Islamists, those Muslims who seek to replace the Constitution with the Koran and apply Islamic law in its entirety and severity – who, in other words, seek not just to tweak the tax code but to change the nature of the United States?
Until now, their campaign contributions have been unknown. A new initiative of the Middle East Forum's Islamist Watch provides a first look at the dimensions of this lobby, using a sortable database. The Islamist Money in Politics (IMIP) project finds that, over the past 15 years, prominent figures associated with six leading American Islamist organizations have donated almost $700,000 to federal U.S. candidates.
Those six are the
  • Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR)
  • Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA)
  • Islamic Society of North America (ISNA)
  • Muslim Alliance in North America (MANA)
  • Muslim American Society (MSA) and
  • Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC).
Associates of CAIR lead the way in dollar terms, making over $430,000 in campaign contributions to candidates for federal office. That's a nice piece of change from a group named as an "unindicted co-conspirator" in America's largest terror-financing case, in which the federal judge found "ample evidence" of CAIR's links to Hamas.

André Carson, Islamist favorite and congressman from Indiana.
Overall, Islamist money is relatively minor in the forthcoming 2014 congressional elections, but IMIP information has several benefits. It holds politicians accountable for accepting funds from a soiled source. It signals the Islamist lobby's affections and intentions. And it tells voters who takes money from individuals linked to enemies of the United States and its allies.
In Indiana, Democratic representative André Carson has received almost $34,000 from Islamist sources for his congressional runs since 2008. In contrast, his Republican opponent this November, newcomer Catherine Ping, has received not a dime from them. That's the same Carson who appeared at the 2012 annual ICNA-MAS convention, where he encouraged American schools to look "at the model we have in our madrassas ... where the foundation is the Qur'an."
In Michigan's hotly contested race for an open U.S. Senate seat, Islamist donors this cycle have donated $2,576 to Republican Terri Lynn Land, and over three times as much to Democrat Gary Peters ($8,200). We now know who the Islamists like best in Michigan.
This fits a larger pattern. In the 2013 and 2014 federal campaigns, Islamists gave Democrats $57,408 and only $3,326 to Republicans. That's a ratio of 17 to 1.
Thanks to Islamist Money in Politics, the sun has begun to shine on this budding arena of Islamist influence. Future investigations will go beyond the six organizations and also look into state and local candidates, thereby exposing the ultimate in tainted political contributions.
Mr. Pipes (DanielPipes.org) is president of the Middle East Forum. © 2014 All rights reserved by Daniel Pipes.

Sunday, August 24, 2014

Michigan Republicans Name Slate For The Fall

Your faithful correspondent was one of the 5000 people who attended the Michigan Republican convention this past weekend in Novi, MI.  It was a well attended meeting with a lot of enthusiasm.

We will be posting pictures and articles later of a revolutionary product we displayed at the convention. The response to this new campaigning tool was spectacular.  Stay tuned for more information.
Conservative Tom






Republicans pick Calley over tea party

challenger

Associated PressAugust 23, 2014 Updated 17 hours ago
 — Lt. Gov. Brian Calley was overwhelmingly backed by Michigan Republicans on Saturday, beating out a tea party advocate for the party's nomination, as activists sought to unify behind a slate of candidates in hopes of retaining control of all three branches of state government in November.
Gov. Rick Snyder's running mate easily fended off a challenge from Wes Nakagiri, who had been critical of Snyder for expanding Medicaid and supporting Common Core education standards. Snyder called Calley the "best partner" and a strong conservative voice in the administration.
"I am absolutely fired up to be your governor. ... Let's sweep again in 2014 and go get this job done," Snyder, who ran unopposed in the August primary and will face Democrat Mark Schauer, told thousands of delegates inside the Suburban Collection Showplace in Novi.
Also nominated were Attorney General Bill Schuette, Secretary of State Ruth Johnson, state Supreme Court Justices Brian Zahra and David Viviano and high court candidate James Redford, a Kent County Circuit judge. None faced opposition, unlike in contested races for nominations to the state Board of Education and university boards.
Democrats planned to begin choosing nominees Saturday at their convention in Lansing, though most of their higher-profile candidates will not be nominated until Sunday.
It is customary for activists to get behind the gubernatorial candidate's choice of running mate. Yet Nakagiri's bid to be an unwelcome guest on the GOP ticket — while a longshot — could not be discounted given the unpredictability of convention politics and some conservatives' unease with the more moderate Snyder.
The Republican "establishment" spent a year working to recruit allies for Snyder and Calley, 37, to run as precinct delegates.
Out of more than 2,000 votes cast, Calley won 65 percent to 35 percent. After learning the result, Nakagiri, who lives in Livingston County's Hartland Township and founded the RetakeOurGov tea party group, moved to make the ballot unanimous for Calley.
"It's important that we look forward and be unified to defeat the Democrats," Nakagiri said.
Dennis Armstrong, 65, of Coldwater, said he voted for Calley because was the better candidate, citing his professionalism and moral values.
"We may not agree 100 percent with the positions (Snyder) has taken on some issues, but compared to the possible alternative I'd take Gov. Snyder any day over Mark Schauer ... If you look at where the state of Michigan was four years ago financially compared to what it is now, it's a night and day difference," said Armstrong, a retired utility company supervisor and secretary of the Branch County Republican Party.
Jack Powell, a 66-year-old retired automaker from Montrose, said he backed Nakagiri to send a message to Snyder.
"I respect the (governor) for a lot of things, but I don't think he's being conservative enough as far as how we feel on certain issues, and one of them is same-sex marriage. That is very big issue," he said.
Snyder, who keeps mostly silent on social issues, said in a 2010 debate that he supported marriage as "between a man and a woman." As governor, he has said the state will not recognize hundreds of same-sex marriages performed in a brief window in March while the broader question of Michigan's gay marriage ban remains in court.
The nominating convention also was a chance for candidates already on the November ballot to rally the party's base.
"If we work together, we can balanced the budget, repeal and replace Obamacare, fix our roads, trained our skill workers, stop outsourcing, secure our border and throw Sen. Harry Reid a retirement party," said U.S. Senate candidate Terri Lynn Land, who faces Democratic U.S. Rep. Gary Peters for the seat held by retiring Democrat Carl Levin.
Snyder touted the creation of nearly 300,000 jobs, population growth, elimination of Michigan's business tax and passage of a right-to-work law that made payment of union fees voluntary for unionized workers.
"The message we need to send is, 'This is not the time to go back to the past, to go to those old broken Michigan days, but to go the future and accelerate the progress and say our brightest days are ahead of us," he told the crowd.
Republicans nominated Maria Carl and Jonathan Williams to the state education board. Those chosen to run for the University of Michigan board were Ron Weiser and Rob Steele; Melanie Foster and Jeff Sakwa were picked for the Michigan State University board; and Michael Busuito and Satish Jasti were selected for the Wayne State University board.
The GOP said a record 5,000 delegates, alternate delegates and others attended the convention.

Read more here: http://www.newsobserver.com/2014/08/23/4090752/republicans-meet-to-nominate-state.html#storylink=cpy

Tuesday, August 19, 2014

Michigan Senate Seat Increasingly Looks Like A Win For Republicans. Could It Actually Happen?

Land Gaining Ground for Levin’s Seat – Should She Thank Obama?

Dem Rep. Peters’ biggest problem come November could have everything to do with the president.
by
ROD KACKLEY
August 16, 2014 - 11:38 pm
Terri Lynn Land is gaining ground in her campaign to replace Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) – and the Republican from Grand Rapids may have President Obama to thank for it.
Rep. Gary Peters’ (D-Mich.) lead over Land has been cut from five percent – 43 percent to 38 percent – in the July 25 Mitchell Research & Communications poll to just one percent in the latest poll, 45 percent to 44 percent. It was conducted the night of the Michigan primary election, Aug. 5.
The Harper Polling survey that was also conducted the night of the Michigan primary shows the race for Senate in Michigan has moved into a virtual tie with Peters leading the race by only one percent, 45-44 percent.
The automated Mitchell Research survey of 626 likely voters, with a margin of error of five percent, was also conducted two weeks into a major media buy by Land that included the hardest-hitting, most focused ads of her campaign.
Voters in Michigan are no longer being subjected to bland theme ads in which Land says she can get Congress to work together just like she taught her children to play together better in the backyard, or wonders with coffee cup in hand how a man could (really?) know more about women than she.
Now, Land is going after Peters on immigration reform, outsourcing American jobs, a nuclear Iran, and U.S. trade policy. Not only is her campaign launching its own attack ads, they are also offering, for the first time, some real policy statements from the candidate.
“It’s clear that the increase in media spending by Land over the past two weeks is impacting the race again,” Steve Mitchell, the chairman of Mitchell Research & Communications, Inc., said.
“As Election Day get closer, voters are recognizing that she is the candidate with a plan to secure the border, stop outsourcing, and put Michigan first,” said Heather Swift, spokeswoman for the Land campaign.
Land has been hitting Peters hard on the issue of immigration, accusing him of being “two-faced.”
Her campaign started running a new ad the morning after the Mitchell survey was taken. “Playing Both Sides” includes two clips of Peters talking about immigration.
“Certainly enforcement is very important,” Peters says in the first soundbite. In the second, he says, “Immigration reform is not about more enforcement.”
The narrator then hammers the point home in the last lines of the ad by saying, “Gary Peters plays both sides of the issue, putting Washington politics ahead of what’s best for America and best for Michigan.”
Land included immigration reform in her “Michigan First” plan that was released Aug. 6.
She called for the enforcement of immigration laws that are already on the books, making the immigration system more efficient, increasing the number of high-tech visas that are issued, and sealing off the border to Mexico.
“As the granddaughter of Dutch immigrants, I understand how important legal immigration is to a strong America,” said Land. “But President Obama and Congressman Gary Peters have failed to enforce our immigration laws and secure our borders, resulting in lost Michigan jobs. I support the rule of law and believe it is essential that we step up enforcement and make our immigration system fair.”
Land believes the U.S.-Mexico border could be effectively sealed with a combination of fencing, more Border Patrol agents and new, high-tech monitoring devices.
The plan does not include an amnesty provision. Instead, the Land campaign writes, “Those who blatantly ignore our laws should not be rewarded, while those who follow the law are forced to wait in line to enter our country – this only invites more lawlessness.”
The ad blitz is only going to get louder. The Hill reported the National Republican Senatorial Committee has placed a $1.5 million ad buy in Michigan’s two biggest markets, Detroit and Grand Rapids, on behalf of Land.
Those ads were slated to run the last week of August.
However, Peters’ biggest problem may have nothing to do with Land or any of her fellow Republicans.
Peters’ biggest problem come November could have everything to do with the president.
Obama took the 2012 presidential election in Michigan, 54 percent to Mitt Romney’s 44 percent. Obama crushed John McCain in Michigan, winning the 2008 vote in the state by 17 points.
The last time a Republican won a president election in the state was 1988 when George H.W. Bush did it. He beat Michael Dukakis by an eight-point margin.
But times have changed. Michigan is no longer a state where Democrats can get much traction by simply riding in President Obama’s jet stream.
The Harper Polling survey of people who say they are likely to vote in Michigan’s general election shows most are not happy with Obama’s performance in office.
President Obama’s job approval (41 percent approve, 52 percent disapprove) in Michigan tracks closely with the national average.
It is even worse among voters who describe themselves as independents. The Harbor Polling survey showed nearly two-thirds of independent voters disapprove of the way the president is handling his job.
On top of that, Peters and Obama have political science and history working against them.
“Typically, the party in control of the White House loses seats in the Senate in the election six years into the presidency,” Mitchell said.
The Harper Polling survey also shows that Land leads among independent voters, two-thirds of whom don’t like the job Obama has done in the White House, 43 percent to 39 percent with 18 percent undecided.
Obama aside, Land still has a problem with women voters and Peters has a problem with men.
The Harper Polling survey shows Peters leads in the female demographic 49 percent to 39 percent, while Land leads 49-41 percent among men.
However, the Mitchell Research survey also showed Land has solidified her GOP base more than Peters has solidified his Democratic base. Peters leads by five percent with independents.
Even with his lock-step support of most White House administration policy, at least until his campaign got serious, Peters has less than unanimous Democratic Party support. Eighty-seven percent of the registered Democrats were promising to vote for him.
And, while the National Journal claimed in an Aug. 6 article that Republicans were losing faith in their candidate for Senate in Michigan, the Harper Polling survey empirically denies that.
It shows Land has 93 percent Republican support.
Swift said the Land campaign can feel a momentum change.
“The more Michigan voters find out about Gary Peters, the less they like him.”