Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label michigan senate race. Show all posts
Showing posts with label michigan senate race. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 19, 2014

Michigan Senate Seat Increasingly Looks Like A Win For Republicans. Could It Actually Happen?

Land Gaining Ground for Levin’s Seat – Should She Thank Obama?

Dem Rep. Peters’ biggest problem come November could have everything to do with the president.
by
ROD KACKLEY
August 16, 2014 - 11:38 pm
Terri Lynn Land is gaining ground in her campaign to replace Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) – and the Republican from Grand Rapids may have President Obama to thank for it.
Rep. Gary Peters’ (D-Mich.) lead over Land has been cut from five percent – 43 percent to 38 percent – in the July 25 Mitchell Research & Communications poll to just one percent in the latest poll, 45 percent to 44 percent. It was conducted the night of the Michigan primary election, Aug. 5.
The Harper Polling survey that was also conducted the night of the Michigan primary shows the race for Senate in Michigan has moved into a virtual tie with Peters leading the race by only one percent, 45-44 percent.
The automated Mitchell Research survey of 626 likely voters, with a margin of error of five percent, was also conducted two weeks into a major media buy by Land that included the hardest-hitting, most focused ads of her campaign.
Voters in Michigan are no longer being subjected to bland theme ads in which Land says she can get Congress to work together just like she taught her children to play together better in the backyard, or wonders with coffee cup in hand how a man could (really?) know more about women than she.
Now, Land is going after Peters on immigration reform, outsourcing American jobs, a nuclear Iran, and U.S. trade policy. Not only is her campaign launching its own attack ads, they are also offering, for the first time, some real policy statements from the candidate.
“It’s clear that the increase in media spending by Land over the past two weeks is impacting the race again,” Steve Mitchell, the chairman of Mitchell Research & Communications, Inc., said.
“As Election Day get closer, voters are recognizing that she is the candidate with a plan to secure the border, stop outsourcing, and put Michigan first,” said Heather Swift, spokeswoman for the Land campaign.
Land has been hitting Peters hard on the issue of immigration, accusing him of being “two-faced.”
Her campaign started running a new ad the morning after the Mitchell survey was taken. “Playing Both Sides” includes two clips of Peters talking about immigration.
“Certainly enforcement is very important,” Peters says in the first soundbite. In the second, he says, “Immigration reform is not about more enforcement.”
The narrator then hammers the point home in the last lines of the ad by saying, “Gary Peters plays both sides of the issue, putting Washington politics ahead of what’s best for America and best for Michigan.”
Land included immigration reform in her “Michigan First” plan that was released Aug. 6.
She called for the enforcement of immigration laws that are already on the books, making the immigration system more efficient, increasing the number of high-tech visas that are issued, and sealing off the border to Mexico.
“As the granddaughter of Dutch immigrants, I understand how important legal immigration is to a strong America,” said Land. “But President Obama and Congressman Gary Peters have failed to enforce our immigration laws and secure our borders, resulting in lost Michigan jobs. I support the rule of law and believe it is essential that we step up enforcement and make our immigration system fair.”
Land believes the U.S.-Mexico border could be effectively sealed with a combination of fencing, more Border Patrol agents and new, high-tech monitoring devices.
The plan does not include an amnesty provision. Instead, the Land campaign writes, “Those who blatantly ignore our laws should not be rewarded, while those who follow the law are forced to wait in line to enter our country – this only invites more lawlessness.”
The ad blitz is only going to get louder. The Hill reported the National Republican Senatorial Committee has placed a $1.5 million ad buy in Michigan’s two biggest markets, Detroit and Grand Rapids, on behalf of Land.
Those ads were slated to run the last week of August.
However, Peters’ biggest problem may have nothing to do with Land or any of her fellow Republicans.
Peters’ biggest problem come November could have everything to do with the president.
Obama took the 2012 presidential election in Michigan, 54 percent to Mitt Romney’s 44 percent. Obama crushed John McCain in Michigan, winning the 2008 vote in the state by 17 points.
The last time a Republican won a president election in the state was 1988 when George H.W. Bush did it. He beat Michael Dukakis by an eight-point margin.
But times have changed. Michigan is no longer a state where Democrats can get much traction by simply riding in President Obama’s jet stream.
The Harper Polling survey of people who say they are likely to vote in Michigan’s general election shows most are not happy with Obama’s performance in office.
President Obama’s job approval (41 percent approve, 52 percent disapprove) in Michigan tracks closely with the national average.
It is even worse among voters who describe themselves as independents. The Harbor Polling survey showed nearly two-thirds of independent voters disapprove of the way the president is handling his job.
On top of that, Peters and Obama have political science and history working against them.
“Typically, the party in control of the White House loses seats in the Senate in the election six years into the presidency,” Mitchell said.
The Harper Polling survey also shows that Land leads among independent voters, two-thirds of whom don’t like the job Obama has done in the White House, 43 percent to 39 percent with 18 percent undecided.
Obama aside, Land still has a problem with women voters and Peters has a problem with men.
The Harper Polling survey shows Peters leads in the female demographic 49 percent to 39 percent, while Land leads 49-41 percent among men.
However, the Mitchell Research survey also showed Land has solidified her GOP base more than Peters has solidified his Democratic base. Peters leads by five percent with independents.
Even with his lock-step support of most White House administration policy, at least until his campaign got serious, Peters has less than unanimous Democratic Party support. Eighty-seven percent of the registered Democrats were promising to vote for him.
And, while the National Journal claimed in an Aug. 6 article that Republicans were losing faith in their candidate for Senate in Michigan, the Harper Polling survey empirically denies that.
It shows Land has 93 percent Republican support.
Swift said the Land campaign can feel a momentum change.
“The more Michigan voters find out about Gary Peters, the less they like him.”

Friday, May 9, 2014

Michigan Senate Campaign. Obama/Reid/Steyer Supporter Peters Verses Koch Supporter Land.

May 8, 2014 at 8:29 am

Land campaign criticizes Peters on pipeline 

opposition



Republican Senate candidate Terri Lynn Land is trying to make the opposition of Rep. Gary Peters, D-Bloomfield Township, to the controversial Keystone XL pipeline, which would carry oil from the Canadian tar sands to U.S. refineries (YouTube)
Republican Senate candidate Terri Lynn Land is unveiling two new Internet ads that criticize her rival for opposing the Keystone XL pipeline and tying him to a billionaire.
Land is trying to make the opposition of Rep. Gary Peters, D-Bloomfield Township, to the controversial pipeline that would carry oil from the Canadian tar sands to U.S. refineries, a campaign issue. Her ads cite media reports that Peters attended a Feb. 19 event with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and former Vice President Al Gore at the San Francisco home of Tom Steyer, a billionaire hedge fund manager who has vowed to spend tens of millions in favor of candidates who oppose the pipeline.
“Gary Peters — working for billionaires not Michigan,” say the two ads from Land. “Steyer could make millions by killing the pipeline by investments in Keystone’s competitor.”
Last month, the Obama administration indefinitely delayed a decision on the pipeline — potentially until after the 2014 midterm elections.
The State Department said it was delaying a decision on whether to approve a permit citing a decision by a Nebraska court to invalidate part of the pipeline route. The Nebraska Supreme Court is expected to take up the case this fall.
The U.S. government has been studying the issue for more than five years. Supporters say the pipeline will create jobs while opponents say the project is environmentally unsound and will boost heat-trapping gas emissions and warn of potential spills.
"Voters deserve to know that Congressman Peters and his allies have traded Michigan jobs and American energy security for more than $400,000 in shady contributions from a liberal California billionaire who invested in a competing pipeline,” said Heather Swift, a spokeswoman for Terri Lynn Land. “Michiganders support the Keystone by a margin of nearly 2:1.”
Peters campaign didn’t immediately respond. It’s aired its own Web ads recently criticizing Land’s position on women’s rights.
Democrats have repeatedly criticized Land’s connection to two other billionaires — industrialists Charles and David Koch — who have largely funded more than $5 million in ads in Michigan attacking Peters. Democrats accuse her of following “marching orders from the Koch brothers and opposing an increase in the minimum wage.”
“By opposing an increase to the minimum wage, Terri Lynn Land is once again siding with the billionaire Koch brothers over hard working Michiganders,” said Justin Barasky, a spokesman at the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.“Land supports tax breaks for billionaires like the Kochs but opposes a minimum wage hike, standing against the majority of Michiganders who support growing the economy and strengthening Michigan’s middle class.”


From The Detroit News: http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20140508/POLITICS02/305080075#ixzz318kb8Npo

Tuesday, May 6, 2014

Representative Peters Once Again Votes Against The Will Of Michigan Residents. He Is A Political Hack Who Should Not Become A Senator!

Gary Peters wrong on Keystone

Peters (Max Ortiz / The Detroit News)
The Obama administration went against the popular opinion of the American people last month with its decision to delay indefinitely the building of the Keystone XL until after the 2014 election. The pipeline is a 1,700-mile project that would transport 830,000 barrels of crude oil a day, most of it from Canada’s oil sands to refineries in Port Arthur, Texas.
In addition, the undertaking would create short-term and long-term middle class jobs for both the Canadian and U.S. economies. Precisely, economic studies have found that the project would create 20,000 manufacturing and construction jobs and an additional 118,000 spin-off jobs.
President Barack Obama said last year, “The net effects of the pipeline’s impact on our climate will be absolutely critical to determining whether this project is allowed to go forward.”
Meanwhile, the administration’s latest decision comes after an exhausting five years and two investigations into the pipeline’s potential impact on the environment by the State Department which have concluded that the effects are minimal.
The Wall Street Journal reported a week ago that Obama and Democrats are feeling pressure from liberal billionaire Tom Steyer who has recently emerged as one of the biggest opponents against Keystone XL. Through his organization, NextGen Climate Action, Steyer has vowed to raise at least $100 million to back vulnerable Democrats in November in an effort to help them keep the Senate as long as they oppose the pipeline.
In recent months, Gary Peters has been tied to the billionaire. Back in February, Steyer hosted a fundraiser for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. Among the 70 guests in attendance at Steyer’s home that included Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Al Gore, was Peters. The attendees reportedly enjoyed grass-fed beef from Steyer’s ranch in addition to salmon.
Peters voted against the bipartisan North Route Approval Act, H.R. 3 which passed the House 241-175 last May and would have expedited the process and declared that a presidential permit not be required for approval of the Keystone XL pipeline’s northern route. Meanwhile, Harry Reid, whose Senate Majority PAC has already spent millions backing Peters and others in hopes of maintaining a majority, has refused a vote in the Senate with the intentions of not forcing the hand of those vulnerable Democrats in states where it would be politically unpopular to vote against the pipeline.
This begs the question: Whose back does Peters have? He claims to be a champion of the middle class yet his actions are more in line with that of a career politician beholden to special interests who do not support the will of both Michiganians and the American people. A poll released recently by Rasmussen revealed that 61 percent of the American people favor building the Keystone pipeline.
This project would not only create thousands of the jobs across the country but would also provide a boost to Michigan’s economy. Peters has a responsibility to inform Michiganians where he stands on this issue.
Brandon Helderop is a New Hudson-based freelance writer who is active in the Republican Party.