Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label quinnipiac poll. Show all posts
Showing posts with label quinnipiac poll. Show all posts

Monday, March 27, 2017

Trump Must Learn From ObamaCrapCare Fiasco. He Must Not Compromise On What He Told The Voters


Analysis 

President Trump would like to move on, but healthcare bill's demise will punish him



Cathleen Decker
Blame for the failure of the Republican healthcare bill will fall on multiple parties, including House Speaker Paul D. Ryan, who helped craft it, and the conservative and more moderate GOP factions that warred over its details and cost Republicans the unity they needed.
But the political impact will inevitably fall hardest on President Trump, who presented himself in the presidential campaign as a man singularly positioned to serve as the ultimate deal maker in Washington.
ADVERTISING
During the campaign, Trump mocked traditional politicians as negligent
negotiators not up to the task of forging agreements for the benefit of Americans,
whether in the area of trade or healthcare policy.
As Friday’s swiftly moving developments made clear, however, it was his
administration that was not up to the requirements of pushing through difficult legislation. The White House proved unable either to craft a policy balance that
could please enough Republicans or to come up with a compelling argument to
 persuade Americans to pressure members of Congress.


“To have the opportunity to do it, and not get it across the finish line — I don’t
think it can be viewed in any way other than a big defeat,” said Lanhee J. Chen, a Republican policy specialist and veteran of past presidential campaigns.
Trump, in brief remarks after Ryan (R-Wis.) pulled the bill from consideration,
did not take responsibility for its demise. He blamed Democrats for failing to vote
 for the measure but also suggested he would work with them for a bipartisan
and “truly great healthcare bill in the future.”
Trump also indicated he was relegating healthcare to a lower position on his
agenda and putting a priority on tax reform, which he has suggested in recent
 days has long been his favorite topic.
But any important legislation the president hopes to push could now be in
danger from some of the same factors that doomed the healthcare measure.


For one, Trump has been
reluctant to get into the policy
 weeds in a way that allows him
 to barter with lawmakers; in the
 weeks leading up to Friday, he
 stuck in public to generalized
campaign-style descriptions of
the plan.
Even when analysts suggested
that its costs would fall most
 harshly on some of his own
voters — older, poorer Americans — he did not counter with any specific
 argument, other than the insistence that those voters should trust him.
The ideological divisions that marked the healthcare debate are likely to
resurface during discussions of tax policy and the budget.
The tax fight is expected to feature wrestling between traditional Republicans
seeking tax breaks for corporations and the wealthy, and more populist members
 who want to give greater help to the middle-class voters who contributed to
Trump’s victory.
On the budget, Republicans are likely to be split between competing desires to
 cut the deficit and expand defense spending.
Trump’s stance in those fights is up in the air. Even more than most politicians,
he has been reluctant to ask voters to accept trade-offs, putting him in a weak
position for crafting legislative compromises.
He is hurt further by entering these legislative fights from a vulnerable position;
he is operating far below ground when it comes to voter support.
A Quinnipiac University poll published this week said that 56% of voters
 disapproved of how Trump was handling his job; only 37% supported him.
Other polls have shown similar numbers.
Worse for the president, some of the voter groups that have most strongly
backed him have begun pulling away, the poll indicated.
Two weeks ago, a Quinnipiac poll showed that male voters backed Trump by
4 points; in the latest poll, they disapproved by 9 points. His support among
 Republicans has fallen from 91% — a typical rating for a president from his
own party — to 81%. Among whites, narrow support has given way to a 6-point
 deficit, the poll found.
Among the group that arguably secured the presidency for Trump — white
voters without college degrees — only 50% approved of his tenure, compared
 with to 43% who disapproved, a stark difference from their enthusiastic
 approval of him earlier.
“We’ve been polling for 24 years and have never seen anything like this,” said
 Timothy Malloy, the assistant director of the poll. “Far and away, the worst
 numbers ever seen in a president.”


Malloy said the findings
 indicated that Trump had been
damaged by his contention that President Obama wiretapped
him in Trump Tower — a view
 to which Trump has stuck
despite assertions by FBI Director
James B. Comey and others that
 no such activity took place.
Trump likely did not help himself
 by backing a healthcare plan that
 was less popular than he is. The
 poll found that only 17% of Americans supported the measure; more than
2 in 5 voters said they were strongly against it.
Notably, Republicans were unenthusiastic about the proposal, while
Democrats were energetically against it.
“There’s fear in those numbers,” said Malloy, referring to findings that a
majority of Americans were afraid the plan would diminish insurance coverage.
A big loss, even an early loss, does not necessarily presage a failed presidency.
As Chen noted, Trump has nearly four years to go before his next election.
“People in politics have very short memories. I don’t think it sets the course for
 the rest of his presidency in any way,” said Chen. So far, he added, Trump has accomplished “a lot of good combined with unforced errors.”
But learning from the healthcare disaster will require not only a change of
strategy, but an awareness of shortcomings for a president who, for all his
attraction to disruption, has been stubbornly set in his ways.
The responses of the two Republican leaders on Friday was as instructive as
 it was opposing.
Speaker Ryan spoke of the difficulty of passing “big things” and took his own
 share of blame: “We’ve got to do better, and we will,” he said.
Trump, however, indicated with some relish that he was looking forward to
watching Obamacare “explode” — seeming unconcerned about the human impact.
“They own it,” he said of Democrats.
He praised his fellow Republicans. But in his one comment that indicated the
 loss might serve as a learning experience, he included the suggestion of
payback against those in his party who had dared to vote against his wishes.
“We all learned a lot,” he said. “We learned a lot about loyalty.”

Thursday, March 16, 2017

Should We Call Her Madam Mayor?

Report: Yes, Hillary Is Seriously Looking Into NYC Mayorial Run

Dennis Van Tine/MediaPunch/IPX
24615428 Comments3511
Will Hillary Clinton be the next mayor of New York City? According to various
reports, she's seriously considering making a run at it.
The latest report comes from TMZ, who spoke with an attendee of a recent
 small gathering with Clinton and some key NYC political players. According
to TMZ's source, the failed presidential candidate brought up a mayorial run:
Hillary Clinton was at a small gathering recently with some politically connected people in NYC, and it seems she's noodling the idea of

running for mayor.
A source who was at the gathering last month says Hillary brought

up the topic of running and made it clear she was honestly considering

it.
We're told she was talking to people in her close circle to gauge the level of interest and support in a Clinton candidacy.
The claims by the TMZ source fall in line with other recent reports of Clinton
 eyeing the prestigious mayorship. Though Team Clinton has shrugged off
 the rumors publicly, reports of tension between Mayor Bill de Blasio and Clinton,
 along with de Blasio's struggling poll numbers, have added fuel to the fire.
A recent Quinnipiac poll found that if Clinton ran as an Independent, she
 would beat the embattled de Blasio by nearly 20 points, 49 to 30. Though no
one would fault Clinton for being skeptical of polls, that advantage is nothing
to sneeze at.
The alleged tension between the two Democrats first came to light via the
WikiLeaks email releases last year showing frustrations mounting between
 de Blasio and Hillary's camp over his refusal for months to endorse her. 
"De Blasio, a progressive, declined to endorse Clinton’s bid to be the
 Democratic presidential nominee for months," The Hill reports. "He
 finally endorsed her in October of 2015, but the chill between the two
 camps persisted and de Blasio never had a prominent role as a Clinton surrogate."
So will it be "Mayor Hillary Clinton"? That might not be music to the ears
 of conservatives, but it's certainly better than "President Hillary Clinton."

Thursday, July 14, 2016

Could Hillary Not Be Nominated?

Democrats ‘freaked out’ about polls in meeting with Clinton


AddThis Sharing Buttons
15
 31
Moriah Ratner
Nervous Senate Democrats raised concerns with Hillary Clinton during a private meeting in the Capitol Thursday over a recent poll showing Donald Trump leading or tied in key battleground states.
“Some people were freaked out, they were looking down at the polls on Real Clear Politics and asking why it was so close,” said a Democratic senator who attended the meeting, referring to a website lawmakers were checking out on their personal devices.
Clinton’s response?
“She said there are other issues. People are unhappy and they don’t trust institutions,” the senator explained.
A second Democratic source in the meeting confirmed there was “a mention of the Florida poll.”
A Quinnipiac University poll released this week showed Trump up 42 percent to 39 percent in Florida, a crucial swing state. Clinton had an eight-point lead in Quinnipiac’s poll of the state last month.
The same survey showed Trump ahead two points in Pennsylvania, another big swing state, and tied in Ohio. The three states have been viewed as the keys to victory in the last four presidential elections.
The source emphasized that no one suggested that Clinton wasn’t running a strong race or questioned her performance.
Instead, it was an acknowledgement that the presidential race will be very close even though many Washington-based strategists and pundits on both sides of the ideological spectrum question Trump’s seriousness as a candidate.
“There was concern raised about the race because we know it’s going to be a close race,” said the source.
A senior Senate Democratic aide who was not in the meeting acknowledged that senators have raised concerns about the closeness of the polls at other times.
“We wouldn't be Democrats if there weren't a few bed-wetters,” the aide said.
But the aide said Democratic lawmakers have felt reassured that when the margin between Clinton and Trump narrows it’s because Clinton’s numbers dip, not because Trump’s climb.
Clinton suffered a public relations blow earlier this month when FBI Director James Comey issued a statement criticizing Clinton for being “extremely careless” in her handling of classified material on a private email server. 
Senate Democrats are especially vested in the race because they’re resting their hopes on winning back the upper chamber on Clinton winning in November.
A study published last year by the University of Virginia’s Center for Politics showed a high correlation between presidential and Senate results, historically. In 2012, the correlation was 0.78, compared to a perfect correlation of 1.
The sense of uneasiness among Senate Democrats is heightened by their observation that Trump has stayed within striking distance in pivotal states despite being vastly outspent.
NBC News reported this week that Clinton’s campaign and allied Super PACs have spent $57 million so far while Trump’s campaign hasn’t spent anything and two allied outside groups have spent only $3.6 million.
“Team Clinton” has outspent “Team Trump” in nine battleground states by a 40-1 ratio, NBC reported.
Nevertheless, Democratic senators praised the meeting as “good” and “productive.”
“It was very good. People were very excited to have her there,” said Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.).
Sen. Bob Casey (D-Pa.) said “there were questions that pertained to the campaign and strategy and things like that” but declined to talk about questions about Clinton’s polling status.
He added there’s broad recognition within the caucus that the race won’t be a cakewalk.
“It wasn’t just a meeting where everyone said everything is fine, don’t worry about it. We know this is going to be a tough election. We see it all around us and we have to be prepared for a close election,” he said.

Monday, January 18, 2016

This Is The Same Media Which Had NO Problem With Obama Saying There Were 57 States! Hippocrats

image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2016/01/Trump-Liberty.jpg
Donald Trump speaks at Liberty University on Monday, Jan. 18, 2016 (Photo: CNN screenshot)
Donald Trump speaks at Liberty University on Monday, Jan. 18, 2016 (Photo: CNN screenshot)
Donald Trump’s critics pounced after the Republican presidential front-runner quoted the New Testament before a Christian audience on Monday.
A reference to “Two Corinthians 3:17” was all it took for the Republican presidential front-runner’s Liberty University speech in Lynchburg, Virginia, to catch fire on social media.
“We’re going to protect Christianity. And I can say that – I don’t have to be politically correct – we’re going to protect it,” Trump said. “And I asked [Liberty University Chancellor Jerry Falwell, Jr.], and I asked some of the folks, because I hear this is your major theme right here, but Two Corinthians – Two Corinthians 3:17, that’s the whole ballgame. ‘Where the spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.’ And here there is Liberty College – Liberty University.”
Trump actually quoted the text of the Bible verse accurately, word-for-word. The only thing that some critics objected to is that Paul’s letter to the Corinthians is usually cited in America as “Second Corinthians” instead of “Two Corinthians,” even though the numeral 2 is used in print.
For instance, when publishing this Bible verse, it often is cited correctly as: “Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.” (2 Corinthians 3:17)
In the United Kingdom, British subjects often refer to these letters from the apostle Paul as “One Corinthians” and “Two Corinthians.”

Trump’s attempt to quote Second Corinthians was taken in stride by the audience, but it immediately trended on Twitter as outlets covered the alleged faux pas.
Headlines read:
  • Buzzfeed: Donald Trump knows the Bible so well he misquotes it at Christian university
  • Jezebel: A good Christian could never vote for Donald Trump, who just pronounced it ‘Two Corinthians’
  • Mashable: Donald Trump flubs Bible verse during speech at Christian university
  • New York Times: Donald Trump quotes Scripture, sort of, at Liberty University speech
  • Politico: Trump bungles Bible reference at Liberty University
Students who spoke to CNN were forgiving of the slip.
“I think the fact that he’s putting forth an effort to relate to us is something decent,” said Nacci Palloto, a sophomore at the university.
Trump also enjoys the support of Falwell, the son of Christian evangelist and Liberty University founder Jerry Falwell Sr.
“Donald Trump is a breath of fresh air,” Falwell said during the billionaire’s introduction. “The American public is finally ready to elect a candidate who is not a career politician but rather who has succeeded in real life.”

Trump was in good company with the Scripture mistake. Even radio host Rush Limbaugh initially referred to “Corinthians Two, 3:17” during his broadcast.
“Actually, folks, some Christians would say ‘the Second Letter to the Corinthians,’ not just ‘Second Corinthians.’ Ricardo Montalban, he would say, ‘Rich, Corinthian leather,’ which there never was any of. It was all an advertising gimmick,” Limbaugh joked during the segment.
Pundits’ focus on Republican candidates’ ability to woo Christian voters increased Jan. 11 after a Quinnipiac University poll showed Trump topping Cruz by 2 percentage points in Iowa.
Trump leads his Republican opponents in Iowa with 31 percent support compared to Cruz’s 29 percent.
“I have a great relationship with God,” Trump told CNN’s Jake Tapper on Sunday. “I have a great relationship with Evangelicals. … I don’t like to have to ask for forgiveness. And I am good. I don’t do a lot of things that are bad. I try and do nothing that’s bad.”
The New York Times reported on Monday that its own investigation into Trump’s standing among Evangelicals showed strong support. The newspaper said “dozens of interviews” with voters in 16 states turned up a common response: “His heart was in the right place, that his intentions for the country were pure, that he alone was capable of delivering to a troubled country salvation in the here-and-now.”
“His personal life is saintlike compared to Bill Clinton’s,” Buford Arning, a retired building-supply executive in Statesville, N.C., told the newspaper.
image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2016/01/Trump-religion.jpg
Donald Trump tells CNN's Jake Tapper he has a "great relationship with God" during an interview Jan. 18, 2016
Donald Trump tells CNN’s Jake Tapper he has a “great relationship with God” during an interview Jan. 18, 2016
Copyright 2016 WND

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/01/trump-misquotes-bible-media-critics-pounce/#wBLMhGlFXCKLm51h.99

Monday, November 30, 2015

With Republican Operatives Opposed To Anyone Outside The "Fraternity", Expect Bush To Get The Nomination!



  • Text smaller
  • Text bigger
The full-court press by Republican operatives to derail Donald Trump’s campaign shows no signs of letting up.
Former New Hampshire Republican Party chairman Fergus Cullen has challenged the billionaire’s primary ballot. A six-page complaint filed Monday with the state’s Ballot Law Commission charges Trump of not presenting evidence, under penalties of perjury, that he is a Republican.
“When Mr. Trump filed his Declaration of Candidacy, he was required to ‘swear under penalties of perjury’ that he is a ‘registered member of the Republican Party.’ To my knowledge, Mr. Trump has not presented evidence to the Secretary of State or this Commission that he is a registered member of the Republican Party,” Cullen wrote. “It is my belief that Mr. Trump must present evidence that he is a registered member of the Republican Party because his views, expressed over decades, are inconsistent with the Republican Party Platform and the Republican Party of New Hampshire’s State of Principles and By Laws.”

Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski responded to Cullen’s challenge in a statement to the Union Leader on Monday.
“Number one, Mr. Trump’s views do comport with the Republican Party and number two, from a constitutional stand point, there is such a thing as freedom of speech,” Lewandowski said. “To file such a document against the person who is not only the front-runner, but leading by tremendous margins is outrageous. If anything like this would ever happen, Mr. Trump’s supporters would probably riot in the streets of New Hampshire. This is yet another attempt by the failed GOP establishment to keep Mr. Trump off the ballot because they know he is the only one who can Make America Great Again.”
Lewandowski also suggested Cullen was working for Ohio Gov. John Kasich’s campaign. Cullen denied the charge.
New Hampshire’s Ballot Law Commission met Tuesday morning to hear and consider a handful of complaints, the newspaper reported.
Radio host Rush Limbaugh responded Tuesday to the efforts of Cullen and other Republican Party insiders as “Trump Derangement Syndrome.”
“They’re just grasping,” Limbaugh said in reference of Republican operatives now pooling resources to torpedo Trump’s campaign.
Trump Card LLC, which is run by former communications official for the Republican National Committee Liz Mair, aims to “defeat and destroy” the real-estate mogul through anonymous donors, Fox News reported Tuesday.
“In the absence of our efforts, Trump is exceedingly unlikely to implode or be forced out of the race,” Mair wrote in a memo obtained by the Wall Street Journal Nov. 20.

Trump, who has dominated polls for months, has said he would consider an independent run if the Republican National Committee and its allies do not treat him fairly.
“@WSJ reports that @GOP getting ready to treat me unfairly — big spending planned against me. That wasn’t the deal!” Trump tweeted Monday, WND reported.
Quinnipiac University poll released Tuesday has Trump winning 25 percent of Republican primary voters in Iowa, with Texas Sen. Ted Cruz close behind at 23 percent.
Pollsters surveyed 600 likely Iowa Republican Caucus participants Nov. 16-22, with a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points.
Read Cullen’s full complaint against Trump here.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/11/trump-faces-eligibility-challenge-in-new-hampshire/#PyJ3GJXAQAEMd6ox.99