The Invisible (Female) Palestinians
In a move that has outraged Palestinian women and various Palestinian factions, a number of Palestinian lists contesting the upcoming local elections, scheduled to take place on October 8, have decided to omit the names and photos of female candidates.
Instead of referring to the female candidates by name and publishing their pictures, the electoral lists are using the terms "the wife of" or "sister." Critics have denounced the move as a "sign of retardation, extremism and bigotry." Other Palestinians have gone so far as comparing the removal of the female candidates' names and photos from the lists to the cruel pre-Islamic practice of infanticide (wa'd). The decision to conceal the names and photos of female candidates is seen in the context of the increased "Islamization" of Palestinian society, which is already considered highly conservative. Apart from being a severe blow to the struggle of Palestinian women for equality, the move is in violation of the 2005 Palestinian Local Election Law, which stipulates that candidates must be fully identified by name, age, address and registration number in the electoral list. This anti-woman undertaking is not taking place only in the Gaza Strip, under the control of the Islamist Hamas movement. It is also baring its fangs in some parts of the West Bank, which is ruled by the Western-funded Palestinian Authority (PA), headed by Mahmoud Abbas. Yet Palestinian women's names and pictures have been hidden from electoral lists before. In the previous local election, for example, which took place in 2012 only in the West Bank after Hamas decided to boycott the vote, female candidates' names and photos were replaced with images of a rose or pigeon. Nahed Abu Taima, gender unit coordinator in the Media Development Center at Bir Zeit University, expressed resentment over the disappearance of females from the electoral lists and called on women to boycott the vote: "I'm against the participation of women in this manner. Let men participate in the election alone. Either we have an honorable appearance or we don't want this fake appearance, which ignores the reality of women. The Palestinian Election Commission is not fulfilling its role as required. It is disgraceful that they are using the terms 'sister', 'daughter of' and 'wife of'. Women are not nobody, so as to be hidden or have their names removed or replaced with the names of their husbands. This is the pinnacle of betrayal and repudiation."Another prominent Palestinian female activist, Nadia Abu Nahleh, strongly condemned the misogynistic move: "We consider this action a grave regression in our performance as Palestinians because we are proud of our women's major and basic role in society. Our women have always been partners in our national life. Therefore, it is disgraceful for any Islamic, national or independent list to scrap the names of the women. If they are not willing to recognize the woman's name, how will they accept the role of the women after they are elected? If our names are 'awra [the part of the body of a Muslim that is required to be covered] then our votes should not go to those lists that conceal the names of women."In Islam, a woman's 'awra is the whole of her body except her face and hands. However, some Islamic clerics have ruled that the entire body of the woman is 'awra, including her nails. By contrast, the 'awra for men includes the area from the end of the navel down to, and including the knee. Exposing the 'awra is unlawful in Islam and is regarded as a sin. Many Palestinians took to social media to denounce the practice of hiding the women's names and pictures. On Twitter, activists launched a hashtag entitled, "Our names are not 'awra." "It is deplorable that we have to resort to social media to prove that our names are not 'awra,"wrote Palestinian blogger Ola Anan in a post on Twitter. "It is very piteous that a there are people today who are ashamed to mention the names of their mothers or wives. It is deplorable to see that our society is not marching backward, but is in fact living behind. Months, years and decades pass by and our society does not want to move forward from this 'backward' attitude - not even one step."Palestinian experts and activists are in agreement that the anti-woman move is both illegal and immoral. "What some of the lists did against women is a violation of human rights and the rights of women, as well as a breach of equality," protested Najat Al-Astal, a Fatah female member of the Palestinian Legislative Council. "All women must reject this practice by some of the lists because the conditions for running in the election include publishing the name and identity of all candidates, including females." Karm Nashwan, a lawyer and legal rights activist, said that the removal of the women candidates' names and photos was a breach of the Palestinian law. He added that the move was in the context of attempts to marginalize the role of women in Palestinian society. Female activist Intisar Hamdan condemned the move as being "part of the culture that is ashamed of women's names." Some men have also come out against the move. Furthermore, the Palestinian Central Election Commission has ruled that the move is in violation of the law and its regulations. This is good news for those women who are now threatening to boycott the upcoming election. But the lists that removed the women's names and photos from the public eye do not seem to be deterred by the outcry and protests. While they did submit the full details of their female candidates to the commission, the lists continue to conceal the names and pictures of the women in their public election campaigns, most of which are taking place on social media. Dr. Walid Al-Qatati, a writer and political analyst specializing in Arab and Islamic affairs, saidthat the move reminded him of wedding invitations that are sent out without naming the brides: "The name of the bride has become a letter or an image and those invited to the wedding can only guess who it is. It is as if this is a new form of female infanticide. During the jahiliyyah [pre-Islamic period of ignorance and barbarism], females were being buried alive. Today, they are also being buried alive, but above the soil. They are being buried as human beings first and as women second."Another Palestinian man, Hassan Salim, noted the hypocrisy of those Palestinians who often boast of the progress women have made in Palestinian society: "What kind of hypocrisy is this that while they boast of the role and struggle of women, describing them as angels, we are at the same time ashamed even to mention their names and we replace their pictures with images of roses? ... This degradation of women requires a boycott of these lists."Some Palestinian political groups have also come out against the move. One of them, the Palestinian People's Party (formerly the Communist Party), said in a statement: "The humanity of a woman is not 'awra, the name of a woman is not 'awra, the voice of a woman is not 'awra." Calling on the Palestinian Authority and the Palestinian Central Election Commission to dismiss the "alien and aberrant phenomenon," the party warned against attempts to "drag the Palestinians back towards the Stone Age or even worse than that." When Palestinian women carry out attacks against Israelis, Palestinian society glorifies them as heroes. Then the names and photos of these women are plastered across billboards for all to see and applaud. Yet it appears that when the women wish to work for life rather than for death, their identities are not fit for public consumption.
Khaled Abu Toameh, an award-winning journalist, is based in Jerusalem.
© 2016 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
|
Our goal is to have intelligent discussion of the topics of the day. We realize everyone has their opinion and they should be allowed to express it in a discussion forum without calling each other names. We learn from discussion and not from name calling or argument.We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. See details
Contact Form
Showing posts with label conservadtive musings. Show all posts
Showing posts with label conservadtive musings. Show all posts
Tuesday, September 6, 2016
Is This What Leftist Islam Supporting Women Want?
Friday, July 8, 2016
Thursday, June 16, 2016
Monday, May 23, 2016
French Do Everything To Continue The Tradition Of Being The World's Greatest Collaborators, Whores, And Spineless Politicians
French Political Gymnastics and How to Help the Palestinians
The French government seems to be falling over itself to undo its craven vote in favor of a UNESCO resolution accusing Israel -- referred to as the "Occupying Power" in Jerusalem -- of destroying historic structures on the Temple Mount:
The French however, apparently thought a vote accusing Israel of something, anything, would keep the Palestinian Authority from presenting a resolution on Palestinian independence to the UN Security Council; Ayrault implied in Israel that the UNESCO vote was a quid pro quo. Why? The French have a veto they could exercise in the UN Security Council. But the Palestinians might then object to France replacing the U.S. as the "Great Power" in the "peace process." They already have experience with a veto-wielding interlocutor -- the U.S. -- and they do not want another. The price of an elevated status for the French appears to entail not vetoing Palestinian resolutions, voting for them in UNESCO, and sacrificing Israel in a process that will end in French recognition of a Palestinian State, whether Israel agrees to be bound to the altar or not.
It should be noted that the Russians immediately put out a statement that the UN-sponsored Middle East Quartet is the "only mechanism" for resolving the Palestinian issue. It is not clear whether Putin was supporting American or Israeli interests. Iran and ISIS are similarly disinclined to see the French ascend on this issue. The Palestinians, on the other hand, are thrilled to have an international conference where others will make demands of Israel as the Palestinian experiment in self-government degenerates into poverty and chaos by its own economic, political and social choices, looking more like Venezuela every day. For Palestinians in the street, killing Jews in the "knife intifada" did not take the edge off the popular anger and frustration with their own leadership. Under the circumstances, the French, and France's enabler, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, might usefully consider the approach taken in fact by President George W. Bush, which required changes in Palestinian behavior as a prerequisite for support for statehood. Honored mainly in the breach, Bush's 2002 speech nevertheless remains the best statement of American, and Western, interest in moving the Palestinians toward a functioning state: It is untenable for Israeli citizens to live in terror. It is untenable for Palestinians to live in squalor and occupation. And the current situation offers no prospect that life will improve. Israeli citizens will continue to be victimized by terrorists, and so Israel will continue to defend herself...I wrote at the time that, "Mr. Bush made one huge leap of faith in the speech when he said, 'I've got confidence in the Palestinians. When they fully understand what we're saying, that they'll make the right decisions when we get down the road for peace.' What, in fact, will the U.S. do if the Palestinian people weigh a new constitution and free political parties and STILL decide that blowing up Jews is better? What if they have transparent government, economic advancement and an independent judiciary, and STILL decide Jewish sovereignty must be eradicated with the blood of their children?"The Palestinians have answered half the question. They do not have a "practicing democracy based on tolerance and liberty," but erasing Israel evidently remains their goal. Rather than offering no-cost recognition, the French should demand a few changes first. Shoshana Bryen is Senior Director of the Jewish Policy Center.
© 2016 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
|
Friday, May 20, 2016
When You Cannot Identify The Enemy, You Can Expect Disaster
Trump: 'Ask Hillary Who Blew up the Plane Last Night'
By Jason Devaney | Thursday, 19 May 2016 09:07 PM
Donald Trump used the EgyptAir plane crash to criticize Hillary Clinton after she cried foul over his proposal to temporarily ban Muslims from the United States.
"The fact that Hillary thinks the temporary Muslim ban, which she calls the 'Muslim ban,' promotes terrorism, proves Bernie Sanders was correct when he said she is not qualified to be President," Trump said in a statement.
"Look at the carnage all over the world including the World Trade Center, San Bernardino, Paris, the USS Cole, Brussels and an unlimited number of other places. She and our totally ignorant President won't even use the term Radical Islamic Terrorism. And by the way, ask Hillary who blew up the plane last night — another terrible, but preventable tragedy. She has bad judgement and is unfit to serve as President at this delicate and difficult time in our country's history."
Trump was responding to comments Clinton made during a CNN interview.
"When you say you're going to bar all Muslims, you're sending evidence to the Muslim world, and you're also sending a message to terrorists," Clinton said.
"Donald Trump is essentially being used as a recruiter for more people to join the cause of terrorism."
Trump posted a tweet early Thursday morning about EgyptAir Flight 804, which departed Paris and was heading for Cairo before it dropped off radar over the Mediterranean Sea.
Clinton also said Thursday it seems that terrorism is the likely cause of the missing jetliner.
Related Stories:
"The fact that Hillary thinks the temporary Muslim ban, which she calls the 'Muslim ban,' promotes terrorism, proves Bernie Sanders was correct when he said she is not qualified to be President," Trump said in a statement.
Trump was responding to comments Clinton made during a CNN interview.
"When you say you're going to bar all Muslims, you're sending evidence to the Muslim world, and you're also sending a message to terrorists," Clinton said.
Special:
Trump posted a tweet early Thursday morning about EgyptAir Flight 804, which departed Paris and was heading for Cairo before it dropped off radar over the Mediterranean Sea.
Clinton also said Thursday it seems that terrorism is the likely cause of the missing jetliner.
Related Stories:
© 2016 Newsmax. All rights reserved.
Breaking News at Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/egyptair-donald-trump-hillary-clinton-terrorism/2016/05/19/id/729779/#ixzz49CsskHV0
Urgent: Rate Obama on His Job Performance. Vote Here Now!
Wednesday, May 4, 2016
By Withdrawal From Iraq, Obama Essentially Gave It to Iran. Does This Prove He Is The Leading Muslim In The World?
U.S. ON VERGE OF 'LOSING IRAQ COMPLETELY TO IRAN'
Gen. McInerney: 'It's a very dangerous situation. It's perilous'
image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2014/02/gcorombos_avatar-96x96.jpg
image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2016/05/Iraq-protesters-TW.jpg

Thousands of angry protesters storm parliament in Iraq’s Green Zone (Photo: Twitter)
Escalating protests in Baghdad threaten the Iraqi government as Shiite Muslim factions battle for control for the country, and retired U.S. Air Force Lt. Gen. Tom McInerney says Iran could soon wield all the power in Iraq unless the U.S. changes course in significant ways.
He is also reacting to ISIS killing a U.S. Navy SEAL, who was assisting the Kurdish Peshmerga against ISIS.
In recent days, protesters have stormed government buildings, protesting Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi’s decision to replace members of his cabinet. Al-Abadi said the move was to root out corruption and bring in reformers. The protesters believe it was designed to lessen the influence of different ethnic and sectarian factions.
And an old U.S. nemesis is right in the middle of it.
“What you’re seeing right now is that (radical Shiite cleric) Moqtada al-Sadr is responsible for creating a greater wedge when the current Iraq prime minister wanted to make Iraq more independent from Iran,” McInerney told WND and Radio America.
“You have a combination of Iranian Shiite and Iraqi Shiite competing as to who controls the government and who controls Iraq. That’s the bottom line of what’s going on over there right now,” he added.
Al-Sadr is loyal to Iran. He and his forces are responsible for the deaths of many American troops during the sectarian uprising in Iraq. Al-Sadr then fled to Iran when U.S. forces gained a decisive edge.
McInerney said all of this upheaval can be traced to the Obama administration’s decision to wash its hands of Iraq.
“When we pulled out, this administration fundamentally gave Iraq to Iran,” McInerney said.
Now the Iraqi government is feeling much greater heat from Shiite factions more loyal to Tehran than to Baghdad in addition to the threat posed by ISIS in the north. ISIS still controls Mosul and other swaths of territory in Iraq and is still within striking distance of the capital.
“Unless we have strong allied and U.S. leadership over there, then we are in danger of clearly losing Iraq completely to Iran,” he said.
Listen to the WND/Radio America interview with retired U.S. Air Force Lt. Gen. Tom McInerney:
Tom McInerney says says Iran could soon wield all the power in Iraq
McInerney is not in favor of bringing huge contingents of ground forces back to Iraq, but he said the U.S. could end the ISIS threat very quickly if it would just use its overwhelming and largely unchallenged air power.
“I would have a very aggressive air campaign,” McInerney said. “Not eight (sorties) a day. I’d have hundreds a day. I would take out ISIS right away. I would absolutely destroy them and everything around them, and I would accept the collateral damage that goes with it because it would be a very short and intensive air campaign. That would show our strength.”
His air campaign would include decimating ISIS headquarters and other critical infrastructure in Syria as well as spotting and eliminating weapons and fighters in the desert. He said crushing ISIS would end the dream of the caliphate and stop the flow of radical ideologues to the area.
“Only then can we start reasserting our strength and position in the region,” McInerney said.
On Tuesday, Defense Secretary Ashton Carter announced the death of a U.S. service member as a “combat death” in Iraq. Later identified as a Navy SEAL, the American was officially “assisting” Kurdish forces.
According to Fox News, ISIS was breaking through the Kurdish line when about 20 SEALs swooped in to “heroically” beat back the ISIS forces.
McInerney is not at all surprised that American “advisers” are engaging in direct combat with the enemy.
“Although the administration does not want to admit it, I think it’s obvious when you’re putting those kinds of numbers and those kinds of forces in there as advisers, particularly at the battalion level, that you’re going to have these kinds of incidents, particularly if you get a breakthrough,” McInerney said.
But he said it never should have come to that sort of ground action.
“Where was the air power to stop that effort?” he asked. “Why didn’t we know what was going on down there? That’s my concern. We should have planes airborne 24/7 that could immediately respond to these kinds of attacks.”
Copyright 2016 WND
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/05/u-s-on-verge-of-losing-iraq-completely-to-iran/#KQ1cZS7dtPBY4zcw.99
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)








Subscribe to feed