Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label Jeb. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jeb. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 25, 2017

Trump Has Shaken Progressives And Liberals To The Core



MILO: These Three Screenshots Tell The Story Of Trump’s Election

2

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

Daddy is about to become President, and everyone is still in shock, wondering just how such a thing could have happened. Being a genius, I’ve boiled it down to just three reasons.

These reasons can be seen in visual form below.
Progressive Hubris
Sally Kohn probably knew her tweet wasn’t true when she sent it. Given the fear and hysteria whipped up by Kohn and her ilk, anyone could have predicted the anger, tears, and rioting from progressives that followed the election of Donald Trump. I suspect Kohn sent out this tweet because she was confident, as so many in the media bubble were, that he was never going to be elected President. How could such a thing happen? Hadn’t he been called a racist, a sexist, a misogynist, a Russian plant, someone who mocks the disabled, an Islamophobe, and every other smear in the vaunted leftist arsenal? Wasn’t Mitt Romney’s destruction carried out with far less damning material? Well, Trump wasn’t Mitt Romney. The hysterical, false attacks didn’t work, despite progressives’ confidence in their own smear machine. That confidence remained right up until election day — and some are still convinced it works. Long may their delusion last!
#NeverTrump Hubris
One of the remarkable things about Donald Trump is that he didn’t just beat the progressive establishment — he also beat the conservative establishment. Two political tribes that dominated Washington for half a century were defeated in the space of one election campaign. All the darlings of the conservative establishment — Jeb, Rubio, Ted, and (most hilariously) Evan McMullin were all crushed beneath the wheels of the Trump Train. They, like the progressives, insisted that Trump could never win, right up until election day. And some establishment conservatives still haven’t quite come to terms with the fact that there’s someone in the White House who has higher priorities than tax cuts for Goldman Sachs bankers.
Fake News
There is a cosmic, almost divine comedy to our opponents’ behaviour. What could be more delicious than the media’s decision, when trust in their institution was at an all-time low, to make “Fake News” the narrative of the day after Trump’s election? I mean, what did they think was going to happen? Throughout the campaign, the media threw lie after lie and smear after smear at Donald Trump, blissfully unaware that with every outrageous story they ran, public trust in their profession sank a little lower. Thus the hysterical media campaign against Trump contained the seed of its own destruction from the very beginning. Like Brexit, GamerGate and me, the enmity of the lying press became one of Trump’s greatest selling points to the public. And as the screenshot above shows, they’re still doing it!
DANGEROUS is available to pre-order now via Amazon, in hardcover and Kindle editions. And yes, MILO is reading the audiobook version himself! 

Monday, February 22, 2016

Is A Trump Deal With Cruz The Answer To The Republican Problem?




Phyllis Schlafly has been watching the GOP establishment pick our presidential candidates since before she wrote about it in her book, “A Choice not an Echo,” in 1964. She will tell you, the only president elected in her lifetime without the blessing of the establishment was Ronald Reagan.
Reagan’s ability to communicate with and inspire the American people was the only force more powerful than the money and apparatus of the establishment machine.
Jeb Bush was obviously the pick of the establishment. The money was there, and Bush was definitely spending it, but the GOP primary voter has not been swayed by the hundreds of millions of dollars being thrown at them.
After South Carolina, this is a very different race.
Bush is out, and Rubio is the clear heir of the establishment crown that Jeb relinquished when he suspended his campaign.
The D.C. cartel will do anything to preserve the status quo. The thought of a true outsider winning the Republican nomination is bone chilling to the establishment. Its political life depends on taxpayer money flowing through D.C. and into its pockets and the pockets of its cronies. At this point, the establishment’s only hope is Marco Rubio.

This presidential primary has now become the classic three-man race: The two front-runners shred each other, and the third man slides right past them for the win.
Now that Jeb is out, Rubio will inherit some of his support. More importantly, he gets the full support of the establishment apparatus.
Jeb’s departure from the campaign is a major victory for grassroots conservatives but could be devastating in the long run.
The outsiders needed a divided establishment to continue winning primaries, but now that the establishment has its candidate in Rubio, it will unite against the divided outsiders.
Donald Trump, Ted Cruz and their supporters will soon need to make a choice: One or the other. You can’t have both.
.
In one of the upcoming primaries, Marco Rubio will get a win under his belt, and that may serve to wake up outsiders and force them to unite.
Ted Cruz had better read “The Art of the Deal” now, because at some point in the near future, Donald Trump will offer Cruz a deal.
Unless Cruz pulls into first place soon, he would be wise to take Trump’s deal. Whether it is an offer to be Trump’s running mate, or some other promise, Cruz will either need to step down, or he will hand the election to Marco Rubio.
If Trump and Cruz are both in this race until the end, this will just be another presidential race for Phyllis Schlafly to write about how the establishment installed its candidate and the grassroots got the shaft.
At this point, Cruz may not have any hope of winning the presidency, but he holds all the cards in his decision to hand the election to the establishment. An outsider victory lies solely in the hands of Ted Cruz. One way or another, his commitment to ousting the establishment will become obvious.

Copyright 2016 WND

Sunday, December 27, 2015

Guess Who Is Going To The Western Conservative Conference


image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2015/08/Trump-6002.png
Donald Trump
Donald Trump
By Paul Bremmer
GOP presidential primary front-runner Donald Trump will be taking his seemingly bulletproof campaign to Scottsdale, Arizona, in March for the Western Conservative Conference, where he has been confirmed as a speaker.
Others expected to address the sessions during the March 18-19, 2016, meetings include former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, Sheriff Joe Arpaio, Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., former NRA president Sandy Froman, and Scottie Nell Hughes of the Tea Party News Network.
Reps. Matt Salmon and Paul Gosar, both Arizona Republicans, will serve as co-chairs of the conference, and previous GOP presidential candidate Herman Cain will deliver the opening keynote address.
The Western Conservative Conference is described as the “premier gathering of conservatives in the western U.S.”
It follows a format similar to CPAC or the Values Voter Summit, featuring plenary sessions with guest speakers and panels, breakout sessions covering specific issues, book signings, exhibits, a luncheon, and a dinner reception.
In fact, the WCC used to be called Western CPAC, according to Floyd Brown, president of the Western Center for Journalism. Brown will serve as one of several co-hosts of the conference, as he has in the past, and the WCJ will be one of many sponsoring organizations.
“Traditionally we’ve had conservatives come from all over the country to these conferences, and they’ve been well-attended (usually 500 to 1,000 people), and it’s a great place for conservatives to network and get to know other conservatives and to discuss the issues that are going to really impact this presidential election, and also the congressional races in 2016,” Brown told WND in an interview.
Planned topics for panel discussions include the media, immigration, taxes, Second Amendment rights, free speech, threats to freedom of religion, and more.
Brown, the author of “Killing Wealth, Freeing Wealth: How to Save America’s Economy and Your Own,” also said he will speak at the conference, but he does not yet know what his topic will be.
Brown noted the conference will be held in Arizona the weekend before the Arizona primary. As such, conference organizers have invited most of the current GOP presidential candidates to speak, including Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, Ben Carson, and Carly Fiorina. So far only Trump and Huckabee have confirmed.
Brown said the idea is to let ordinary conservatives influence the eventual nominee.
“We always believe that the more conservatives can have direct interface with the eventual winner, the more likely he or she is to pursue a conservative agenda,” Brown said.
Other invited speakers include Ann Coulter, Sheriff David Clarke, Mark Levin, Sarah Palin, Katie Pavlich, Judge Jeanine Pirro, and Heritage Foundation president Jim DeMint.
In addition, WND founder and CEO Joseph Farah will receive the Western Center for Journalism’s Hero of Freedom Award during a dinner gala celebrating the 25th anniversary of Farah’s founding of the WCJ. Rush Limbaugh has been invited to present the award.
Brown praised Farah for his “unwavering commitment to news without bias and an agenda.”
“I think, of anybody in the modern conservative movement, he typifies what I think you should have in journalism, and that is an aggressive watchdog of government,” Brown stated. “Journalism traditionally has had that role of being government’s watchdog, and too often in modern journalism, the mainstream media has become more of a lapdog than a watchdog of government.”
More information about the Western Conservative Conference is online at the official conference website.

Copyright 2015 WND

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/12/trump-heading-west-with-bulletproof-campaign/#9iUwQxSiZg7dto5J.99

Thursday, October 29, 2015

Jeb Loses The Debate. Is He Tired, Uninterested And Losing Supporters Fast


Bush's Big Bomb


Bloomberg

Republican presidential hopeful Jeb Bush (L) speaks as Marco Rubio looks on during the CNBC Republican Presidential Debate, October 28, 2015 at the University of Colorado in Boulder
.
View photo

Republican presidential hopeful Jeb Bush (L) speaks as Marco Rubio looks on during the CNBC Republican Presidential Debate, October 28, 2015 at the University of Colorado in Boulder (AFP Photo/Robyn Beck)

A few hours before the third Republican presidential debate last night at the University of Colorado Boulder, I was hunched over my laptop, either hard at work or studying Google Maps to determine the nearest dispensary of a form of medication (absurdly) not yet legal in the Empire State, when I overhead some gasbag (and trust me, being a bloviator of the first order myself, I know the type) holding forth about Jeb Bush. About how the debate was a “do-or-die” event for the former Florida governor. A “make-or-break moment” with “everything on the line,” in which the stakes were “the whole ball of wax.” Etc.
After 20-plus years in this racket, my instinctive inclination is to dismiss out of hand such declarations as overheated, hyperbolic gibberish. Of course in presidential politics there are moments that prove to be turning points, either laying a candidate low or vaulting him to greater glory. But it’s rare that such occasions can be predicted in advance. And even rarer is the single setback, however crushing or humiliating, from which a sufficiently determined and resourceful candidate finds it simply impossible to recover. 
A few hours later, however, after absorbing the sheer and epic awfulness of Bush’s debate performance and the collective reaction to it, I had little choice but to concede: maybe the gasbag had a point. Among the political professionals, reporters, and pundits swarming the debate site, the verdict was unanimous and scathing. Across the ideological spectrum on my Twitter feed and in my email inbox, same deal. The pithiest and most damning assessment was issued by @drudge: “Jeb Bush can eat carbs now.” Which was another way of saying, to paraphrase Bruce Willis as Butch Coolidge in Pulp Fiction, Jeb’s dead, baby—Jeb’s dead.
The Bush campaign naturally insists that Jeb is still very much alive. "This contest isn't about who is the best debater or who has the best sound bites," Sally Bradshaw, Bush's longtime chief advisor, wrote in an email to Bloomberg. "It's about who can be the president. Who can actually change Washington. That's hard to do if you are a part of the problem. Jeb isn't going anywhere.”
A snarky wag might agree with Bradshaw on that last point and even extend it: Sure, Bush isn't going anywhere—he hasn't been going anywhere all year. He arrived in Colorado under hellish circumstances, his campaign reeling, his candidacy in crisis, his donors on the brink of defection. The candidate himself, who has rarely demonstrated any of the joyfulness on the trail that he promised at the start of his campaign, has lately seemed increasingly frustrated, defeatist, and even churlish—whining publicly about how he has “a lot of really cool things” he could be doing besides “being miserable, listening to people demonize me.” All eyes were upon him on Wednesday night: his supporters, his contributors, the political class, the media, and even his own staff, all watching and wondering whether he would rise to the occasion.
Not only did he not do that, but he seemed to shrink from it. Asked in the opening round to name his biggest weakness, Bush seemed cranky and petulant right out of the gate: “I am by my nature impatient. And this is not an endeavor that rewards that. You gotta be patient. You gotta be—stick with it, and all that. But also, I can't fake anger.” Ooof.
But it was a now widely heralded exchange with Rubio that brought the debate crashing down on Bush’s head. Foolishly, Miami had telegraphed its punch days in advance: that Bush would take on his junior over his frequent absences from the Senate. But Rubio was ready, and this is what unfolded: 




Everything about this exchange was devastating for Bush. Premeditated though it was, Bush delivered his attack line weakly, framing himself as “a constituent” of Rubio’s, complaining about “constituent service” rather than hammering Rubio for abrogating his elective responsibilities. The “French work week” filigree sounded nothing like Jeb (in fact, it sounded like his longtime strategist and current Right to Rise super PAC impresario Mike Murphy) and was too clever by more than half. And once Rubio began his clearly well-rehearsed counter-punch, Jeb, apparently thinking he had already dropped the mic, was left stammering and slack-jawed—while the audience was left to draw the unavoidable conclusion that the protege was now the sensei.
From that point forward, Bush seemed gutted, pallid—a ghost rising spectrally from a car crash, looking down on the wreckage below. His tie askew, his bearing stiff, and his voice flat, he wandered aimlessly through thickets of tax policy and entitlement reform. His only memorable lines for the rest of the night were memorable in the wrong way: the doofy boasting about his fantasy football team, his suggestion that “You find a Democrat that's for cutting … spending $10, I'll give them a warm kiss.”
While the debate was still ongoing, word quickly spread through the press filing center about a confrontation between Bush campaign manager Danny Diaz and CNBC public relations czar Brian Steel, with Diaz heatedly complaining that Bush received too few questions and too little talk time. But whatever the stats show, Bush’s problem wasn’t the allocation of minutes and seconds relative to his rivals; it was his utter inability to make good use of the moments when he had the floor.
In the spin zone afterwards, Diaz tried to play down the altercation and pivot to his talking points: Bush’s candidacy is built on policy, built on his record, built to last—and he was able to demonstrate all of that on stage in Boulder. The press scrum around him struggled to suppress its incredulity. Nearby, Rubio strategist Terry Sullivan, invited to slam Jeb, simultaneously took the high road and stuck in the shiv: “There’s no need to pile on Governor Bush after his performance tonight.” #SHADE
By this morning, most Bush donors were in full panic mode, and some were already frantically searching for the life boats as they prepared to abandon ship. Throughout the conservative commentariat, there was widespread discussion of Bush’s need to quit the race; even sober, sensible, center-right types such as The Daily Callers’ Matt Lewis were offering that suggestion
It’s possible, to be sure, that reports of Bush’s death are exaggerated, and that the Boulder debate will turn out to be, in the argot of addiction, the night when he hit bottom and rehab and recovery became possible. Bush still has ample resources supporting his candidacy—although they reside for the most part in Murphy’s hands. The race is now arguably wider open than ever, with no clear establishment front-runner—though Rubio may rapidly stake a claim to that spot if his polls numbers rise as sharply as I expect they will, and even Chris Christie is showing signs of life that were unthinkable over the summer. If Bush were to shift most of his focus to New Hampshire, a la John McCain in 2008, it's not inconceivable that he could win there—though in visits there throughout the year, it has been difficult to locate, and not for lack of trying, voters who are enthusiastically for him.
The problem for Bush, however, isn’t just that his performance last night was atrocious; the problem is that his performance was (and struck many elites, including his supporters as) utterly and deeply revealing. The debate in Boulder presented itself as a fundamental test for Bush. What the night required of him, what everyone was watching for, was that he demonstrate that, despite the myriad troubles that have plagued him months, he could still be the guy: the candidate with the performance skills and the fortitude not just to survive but to thrive under pressure. That’s what the GOP is understandably looking for in its standard-bearer. That’s what it takes to win the White House.
It was, as I said, a fundamental test—and Bush failed it, badly. Whether he lacks the ability to perform at the highest level, or the will to find untapped reserves within himself, or perhaps even the requisite hunger for the presidency is a matter for his shrink to figure out. But the scale of the failure is now evident for anyone with eyes to see. Coupled with his dismal standing in the public polls nationally and in the early states, the fund-raising difficulties he now faces, and the cutbacks to his organization that have recently taken place, it's impossible to overstate the severity of the malady that now afflicts him.
Maybe, just maybe, the Jeb Bush who walked off stage last night and woke up to bedlam all around him in his world is still in possession of a pulse. But if so, it’s a faint one. On the eve of November, three months out from the first votes, the guy who entered the race looking like a juggernaut is now a wastrel in the desert, clad in rags, desperately short of food and water. And the vultures are gathering and circling overhead, preparing to pick the carcass clean.
Michael C. Bender and Kendall Breitman contributed to this report.

Thursday, October 22, 2015

Hillary Will Go Down Over Benghazi And Servergate

Jeb Bush to Newsmax: Benghazi 'A Big Problem' For Hillary

Image: Jeb Bush to Newsmax: Benghazi 'A Big Problem' For Hillary
By Cathy Burke   |   Thursday, 22 Oct 2015 10:51 AM
The Obama administration was "trying to avoid a controversy that would hurt their re-election chances" after the 2012 Benghazi attack that killed four Americans – and it's now become "a big problem" for Hillary Clinton, Jeb Bush tells Newsmax TV.

In a wide-ranging, exclusive interview with "Newsmax Prime" host J.D. Hayworth, the former Florida governor and GOP hopeful calls the House Select Committee on Benghazi's probe "important to get a sense of, could those four Americans been saved?"
Asked if Vice President Joe Biden's decision to nix a presidential campaign  shows he's not worried the Benghazi probe will hurt Clinton politically, Bush tells Hayworth "there could be a lot more issues related to just his heart being in it."

"Benghazi is a big problem for Hillary Clinton," he said. "Not so much because of the fact that it happened, although there were requests for security. But it's how the government responded afterwards."

The House committee hearing will try to determine "was there a serious effort to help," Bush said. "And then afterwards, when they tried to create the 'fog of war' and call it a response to a stupid video, was that appropriate?" he added.

"This was in the midst of a campaign and I think the Obama administration was trying to avoid a controversy that would hurt their re-election chances. The four Americans that lost their lives are deserving of a fair hearing on this."
Latest News Update


The full interview is scheduled to air on Newsmax TV beginning Monday at 8pm ET. 


Clinton, who served as President Barack Obama's first secretary of state from 2009 to 2013, faces a highly anticipated congressional grilling Thursday over her role during and after the attacks on the U.S. mission in Libya.

And her performance could determine if voters believe it's time to move on from the controversy that has dogged her presidential campaign.

In a poll released exactly a week ago, results showed most Americans think Clinton hasn't been honest about the State Department's role in the terror strike.


Related Stories:

© 2015 Newsmax. All rights reserved.