Wednesday, December 28, 2016
Trump To Break The Back Of The EPA--Liberals Hate The Idea
By Ben Wolfgang - The Washington Times - Monday, December 26, 2016
As soon as President-elect Donald Trump assumes office Jan. 20, Republican
attorneys general who have spent the past eight years battling the Obama
administration’s climate change agenda will have a new role: supporting the
Republican president’s complex legal effort to roll back that agenda.
By contrast, states with Democratic leadership — such as California, where Gov.
Jerry Brown has promised all-out war against Mr. Trump on global warming —
will go from being environmental partners with the federal government to legal
aggressors on their own.
Earlier this month, 24 attorneys general signed an open letter laying out how
the Trump administration could begin to dismantle President Obama’s global
warming agenda. The effort was led by West Virginia Attorney General Patrick
Morrisey, a Republican who often partnered with Mr. Pruitt in bringing lawsuits
against what they said was EPA overreach
The letter focuses on the EPA’s Clean Power Plan, a proposal to limit carbon
emissions from power plants that requires all states to meet strict pollution
guidelines laid out by the federal government.
Federal data show the plan would drive up electricity prices.
The Supreme Court this year issued a stay halting implementation of the
Clean Power Plan, but Republican attorneys general are eager for the
proposal to be formally taken off the books.
“The incoming administration and Congress now have the opportunity to
withdraw this unlawful rule and prevent adoption of a similar rule in the
future,” the attorneys general wrote. “An executive order on Day One is
critical. The order should explain that it is the administration’s view that the
rule is unlawful and that EPA lacks authority to enforce it. The executive order
is necessary to send an immediate and strong message to states and
regulated entities that the administration will not enforce the rule.”
The executive order, analysts say, is just the first step. Under Mr. Pruitt’s
leadership, the EPA will have to go through a formal rule-making process
to kill the Clean Power Plan, including public hearings, comment periods,
draft proposals and other formalities that likely will take at least a year to
“Soon after Trump takes office, they will issue a proposal to revoke the
Clean Power Plan, but that will actually have to be a fairly comprehensive
document that explains the rationale,” said Jeffrey Holmstead, a leading
environmental attorney and former assistant administrator at the EPA’s
office for air and radiation. “They can’t just say that the president said to
get rid of it and we’re going to do it.”
Because of the Supreme Court stay and the impending doom of the
Clean Power Plan, Mr. Holmstead said, states can continue to ignore
the emissions thresholds without penalty or threat of enforcement from
Some Democrat-led states are likely to continue implementing emissions
reduction programs and are poised to become the EPA’s legal
adversaries over the next four years. They will assume the job held
by Mr. Pruitt’s Oklahoma and Mr. Morrisey’s West Virginia, completing
a full role reversal.
In California, Mr. Brown has challenged Mr. Trump and Mr. Pruitt on
climate change. With each step the Trump administration takes to kill
the Clean Power Plan and other climate programs, California and other
progressive states are sure to set up hurdles with lawsuits.
“We’re got a lot of firepower,” Mr. Brown said in a speech this month.
“We’ve got the scientists, we’ve got the universities, we’ve got the
national labs, and we have the political clout for the battle. And we will
persevere; have no doubt about that.”
The outspoken Democrat said California will launch its “own damn satellite”
if the Trump administration stops satellites meant to track global warming
and temperature patterns.
The New England coalition known as the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative
is expected to keep pursuing voluntary emissions reduction programs, even
without arm-twisting from Washington.
The ultimate goal of the Trump-era EPA, analysts say, will be decentralizing
power over environmental programs and allowing states such as California
to continue harsh emissions limits if they choose.
“What I predict Pruitt will do is just go back to the original intention of the
statutes [under the federal Clean Air Act] where states have a lot of discretion
in how they implemented these things,” Mr. Holmstead said. “A state can
always be more stringent than a federal statute allows. ”