Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Monday, April 17, 2017

The More We Find Out, The Worse It Gets

BOMBSHELL Report: Entire Western World Helped Obama WIRETAP Trump

Joe Raedle/Getty ImagesUS President Donald Trump arrives on Air Force One at the Palm Beach International Airport to spend Easter weekend at Mar-a-Lago resort on April 13, 2017 in West Palm Beach, Florida.
BY:
 JOHN NOLTE

If you are wondering why our national media has pretty much dropped the whole
 Trump-Is-A-Russian-Manchurian-Candidate thing, it is because the naked truth
about the Obama administration's chilling spying -- something the media has
covered up for months -- is finally coming to light. Last week, both The 
Washington Post and The New York Times quietly reported that the Obama
administration had "wiretapped" (their word, not mine) a Trump staffer.
The Trump-hating Guardian then dropped another bombshell, the news
 that pretty much every Western intelligence agency in the world was aiding
 and abetting the Obama administration's unbelievable and unprecedented
(Nixon only wanted to do this) abuse of power against a political opponent:
Over the next six months, until summer 2016, a number of western agencies shared further information on contacts between Trump’s inner circle and Russians, sources said.
The European countries that passed on electronic intelligence – known as sigint – included Germany, Estonia and Poland. Australia, a member of the “Five Eyes” spying alliance that also includes the US, UK, Canada and New Zealand, also relayed material, one source said.
Another source suggested the Dutch and the French spy agency, the General Directorate for External Security or DGSE, were contributors.
Q: So what exactly is this "sigint"?


A: It perfectly meets the modern definition of -- you ready for it? --
 wiretapping!
Signals intelligence (SIGINT) is intelligence-gathering by interception of signals, whether communications between people (communications intelligence—abbreviated to COMINT) or from electronic signals not directly used in communication (electronic intelligence—abbreviated to ELINT). Signals intelligence is a subset of intelligence collection management.
This next bit from the Guardian report is important because it appears to
 vindicate Fox News commentator Judge Napolitano, who was widely-ridiculed
 in the political media, and then suspended by Fox News, for reporting
something very close to this back in March:
Britain’s spy agencies played a crucial role in alerting their counterparts in Washington to contacts between members of Donald Trump’s campaign team and Russian intelligence operatives, the Guardian has been told.
GCHQ first became aware in late 2015 of suspicious “interactions” between figures connected to Trump and known or suspected Russian agents, a source close to UK intelligence said. This intelligence was passed to the US as part of a routine exchange of information, they added.
No one better summed up what was going on here better than
PowerLine's John Hinderaker:
The blindingly obvious point that the Guardian tries to obscure is that the combined assets of all of these agencies failed to find any evidence of collaboration between the Trump campaign and Russia. We know this, because the Democrats have pulled out all the stops. Both before the election, and especially after the election, they have leaked furiously to try to discredit President Trump. If there were any evidence of collusion between Trump (or even obscure, minor “advisers” like Carter Page) and Russia, there would have been nothing else in the Washington Post or the New York Times for the past five months. But they have nothing.
In other words, the whole world was spying on Trump, not just the Obama
administration, and even with all of these resources the Democrats and their
 media got exactly squat. There is no evidence of any wrongdoing between
Team Trump and Russia. There is, however, a growing pile of evidence that
Team Barry needs to be investigated by Congress and the Justice Department.
Hinderaker's second point is that everyone in the world was so sure Hillary
 Clinton was going to beat Trump that all of these countries believed it was
 safe to "curry favor with the new administration" by spying on her opponent,
 by offering her intelligence-oppo during the campaign that was then leaked
 to a MSM that was 100% complicit in this illegal behavior -- because leaking
intelligence is a felony.
If this is not scary enough, try to imagine what Hillary's administration and
 the MSM would be doing to Donald Trump right now if he did not have the
power of the presidency to defend himself. As it is, the media have been
 lyingsmearing, and slandering him without any evidence.
The only weapon Trump has had to fight back with is his access to truth
about Obama's spying, access he would not have had had he not won the
 presidency.
We have already seen the terrifying lengths Hillary and Obama will
 go to as a means to cover up their lies, we have already seen
the violence our media (especially CNN) is willing to gin up in order
 to protect a Narrative. There is no doubt in my mind that with the help of
 their media pals, had Hillary won the presidency, Trump would right now
be in federal prison for a crime he did not commit.