INTERNATIONALNEWS
Uninspired French Voters
Choose a ‘Centrist’
President Rather
Than a Far-Right One
PARIS—As is the case most Sundays,
Rue de Bac in central Paris was quiet
this morning.
The shops were closed, as were most
cafes on this day when self-styled centrist
Emmanuel Macron would defeat the
far-right candidate, Marine Le Pen, to
become France’s next president.
Except for Le Saint Germain cafe,
at the corner of Rue du Bac and
Boulevard Saint-Germain. On
the outdoor terrace, patrons
sipped on coffee and munched
leisurely on croissants, as is
the custom on any morning.
Most were reading a newspaper.
Two American tourists thumbed
through a Lonely Planet
guidebook; true to form,
their voices a decibel level
or two above the rest.
Inside, 58-year-old Marco was
working behind the bar.
Gray-haired with the sleeves
of his white button-down shirt
rolled up and a black apron tied
around his soft waist, Marco
served coffee and croissants
to customers standing at the bar.
“Have you voted yet?” Marco
asked an older man who wore
a driving cap and was reading a
copy of Le Figaro, a staple
conservative French newspaper.
“No,” the man replied between
sips of coffee. “And I don’t plan
to.”
“I’m not going to vote because
both candidates are no good,”
Marco told The Daily Signal,
asking that his last name not
be used due to privacy concerns.
“Neither one talks about the
country. They only talk about
their small problems; it’s only
a quarrel between the two
of them.”
Outside the cafe, the sky was
gray, the air cool and fresh,
and the sidewalks still wet
from spring showers the evening
prior.
A homeless man sat beneath
two vandalized campaign
posters for Macron, France’s
39-year-old former economy
minister under Socialist President
François Hollande. Macron
ended up winning Sunday’s
presidential election by taking
65 percent of the vote to defeat
his rival, Le Pen, 48, of the far
right, eurosceptic, anti-
immigration National Front party.
“His resounding victory
confirms that a very large
majority of our fellow citizens
have united around the values
of the Republic and signaled
their attachment to the European
Union as well as the opening
up of France to the world,”
incumbent French President
Francois Hollande said of
Macron’s victory in a Sunday
evening statement.
Yet, with his win, Macron faces
a divided country with a litany
of economic and security woes
, including terrorism and high
unemployment.
“Many will be breathing a sigh
of relief with Macron’s win but
while he is far more preferable
than the anti-NATO, anti-America
n, and pro-Putin Le Pen, we
should not kid ourselves into
thinking that he represents the
sort of change France so
desperately needs,” Luke
Coffey, director of the Douglas
and Sarah Allison Center for
Foreign Policy at The Heritage
Foundation, told The Daily
Signal.
“While Le Pen would have
done great damage to France
and its standing in the world,
Macron’s stale economic
policies mean that France will
remain on economic life
support for the foreseeable future,” Coffey said.
Abstention
Sunday marked the tepid end
of a historic French presidential
campaign. For the first time in
France’s Fifth Republic, the
Socialists and Les Republicains,
France’s establishment liberal
and conservative political
parties, respectively, were not
represented in the second, final
round of the presidential election.
Sunday’s vote highlighted an
upheaval of France’s political
order and a stark crossroads for
France’s future due to the
diametrically opposing political
policies and philosophies of
Macron and Le Pen.
However, for many French
voters, both Macron and Le Pen
were a disappointment. Le Pen
was too extreme, and Macron
was considered to be under the
thumb of France’s banking elite.
“My favorite candidate was
François Fillon,” Carmen Van
Houten, a 52-year-old pediatric
nurse at a public hospital told
The Daily Signal, referring to
the conservative Les
Republicains candidate who
lost in the April 23 first round
of voting after a scandal-tainted
campaign.
“The media decided for the
French people that the new
president would be Emmanuel
Macron,” Van Houten said.
“For one year now the media
wanted to have a match between
Macron and Le Pen. So today
I’ll go to Fontainebleau Forest
to run a trail. I’ll not go to
vote.”
By all accounts, the lack of
enthusiasm generated by both
candidates translated into
historically low levels of voter
participation. As of 8 p.m. in
be roughly 75 percent—the
lowest level of voter participation
in a presidential second-round
vote since 1969, according to
French news reports.
Macron’s win was decisive. But
with such low levels of
participation, his mandate to
govern might be weakened
“Macron will do nothing,”
Marco said from Le Saint
Germain cafe. “It will just be
another five years of the same
mistakes and failed policies of
[French President Francois]
Hollande. The rich will get
richer, the poor poorer.”
“Divisions remain, but Emmanuel
[Macron] will now have to address
the most important concerns,”
Nicolas Tenzer, founder and
sed think tank, told The Daily
Signal.
“He will have to transform his
victory into a presidential
dynamic in the parliamentary
elections,” Tenzer said. “The
social issues are obviously the main ones, but it’s critical also to have a government with completely new political figures.”
‘Best of a Bad Situation’
Macron represented his own
upstart political party, En
Marche!–translating to “Let’s
go!” or “forward!” in English–
which he formed in April 2016
as a vessel for his maverick
presidential campaign. He does
not have the backing of a major
political party in France’s
National Assembly, which
could make it hard for him
to pass his agenda.
“We’re not celebrating, we’re not
popping open the champagne,”
Olivier Dartigolles, spokesman
for the French Communist Party,
said in a statement to the press
on Sunday evening. “Millions
of people must feel trapped.
Emmanuel Macron was elected
by default.”
Macron’s victory was, however,
a landmark defeat for far-right,
anti-immigration, anti-EU parties
across Europe—as well as for t
he Kremlin’s machinations to
fund and support those parties
to weaken its perceived Western
rivals.
“This was the best of a bad
situation, but at least the only
person more disappointed
than Le Pen right now is
Russian President Vladimir
Putin,” Coffey said.
“It’s certainly a loss for
Russia, and thus good news,”
Tenzer said. “But no one can
be reassured with the National
Front catching 35 percent of
the votes.”
The National Front, the party
of Le Pen, is a controversial
political force in France. Its
founder, Jean-Marie Le Pen
(Marine Le Pen’s estranged
father), was notorious for his
Nazi-sympathizing, anti-
Semitic remarks—including
his calling the Nazi gas
chambers of the Holocaust
a “detail” of history.
Yet, many French voters—
35 percent of them—were
willing to overlook the
National Front’s checkered past and dubious ties to Moscow to upend France’s political and economic status quo.
“I’m for Le Pen,” Regis Aernouts, an antiques dealer in Paris’ Sixth Arrondissement told The Daily Signal on Saturday. “I’m not racist, but I think she would be best for the country. We live in a bubble here in Paris. It is, I think, like what happened in America when you elected Trump. People living in Washington and New York didn’t know what was happening in the rest of the country. It’s the same here in France.”
Scar Tissue
In Paris on Sunday, tourists passed through airport-style security barriers to approach the foot of the Eiffel Tower. Armed army fire teams, clad in body armor and with assault rifles slung across their chests, patrolled among the crowds. News teams from around the world were set up with the Eiffel Tower in the background as reporters rehearsed their stand-ups for election day reports.
Up the river at the Musée d’Orsay art museum, which contains works by Vincent van Gogh, Claude Monet, and Paul Cézanne, people waited for hours in a line that zigzagged around the block before it trickled through metal detectors and X-ray machines at the museum’s entrance.
This was a bellwether day for French democracy, and the fears of a terrorist attack were high.
On the Avenue des Champs-Élysées, a makeshift memorial stands at the spot where, on April 20, an Islamist militant killed French police officer Xavier Jugelé. Within a mound of collected flowers are handwritten notes, candles, and pictures of Jugelé.
The memorial is remindful of the ones that went up on the Promenade des Anglais boardwalk in Nice after a deadly terrorist attack in July 2016, or in front of the Bataclan nightclub in Paris after a terrorist attack, which left 89 dead, in November 2015, or in front of the Paris offices of the French satirical magazine in January 2015 after another lethal terrorist attack.
On this day, election day, the sidewalks of the Champs-Élysées were packed almost shoulder-to-shoulder with pedestrians. At the memorial at the site of Jugelé’s murder, a small group of passers-by paused to silently and reverently consider what had happened here a little more than two weeks ago.
Meanwhile, as unaware tourists marched past, a bullet hole remained in a nearby light pole.
It reminded this correspondent of the top of Institutskaya Street in central Kyiv, Ukraine (now renamed Heroes of the Heavenly Hundred Street) where bullet holes remain in light poles from the 2014 revolution, evidence of when government snipers gunned down protesters in the waning days of deposed pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych’s regime.
Scars of violence on the streets of Kyiv and Paris—reminders, in both places, of the thin veneer that separates civilization from chaos. A dividing line, which is growing thinner in capitals across Europe.
“France will remain divided after the election,” Marco said from Le Saint Germain cafe. “This election will change nothing.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for commenting. Your comments are needed for helping to improve the discussion.