Contact Form


Email *

Message *

Tuesday, February 14, 2017

Could Flynn Have Been Set Up?

REPORT: The Real Reason

 General Michael Flynn Resigned

 Should Absolutely Terrify You

  • 02/14/2017 
  • Source: AAN 
  • by: AAN Staff
13 7 1  48
When General Michael Flynn resigned his position as Donald Trump's
 national security adviser, the reason given was that he had mislead the 
administration in regards to certain conversations with the Russian 
government. But the real reason for his ouster might be something far 
more nefarious. 

In an explosive report, Adam Kredo of the Washington Free Beacon lays 
out what really happened: Flynn was forced out by Obama loyalists in the 
intelligence community who were doing everything in their power to salvage 
the horrific Iran deal. Per Kredo:
...multiple sources closely involved in the situation pointed to a larger, more

secretive campaign aimed at discrediting Flynn and undermining the Trump

White House.

"It's undeniable that the campaign to discredit Flynn was well underway

before Inauguration Day, with a very troublesome and politicized series of

leaks designed to undermine him," said one veteran national security adviser

with close ties to the White House team. "This pattern reminds me of the lead

up to the Iran deal, and probably features the same cast of characters."

The Free Beacon first reported in January that, until its final days in office,

the Obama administration hosted several pro-Iran voices who were critical

in helping to mislead the American public about the terms of the nuclear

agreement. This included a former Iranian government official and the

head of the National Iranian American Council, or NIAC, which has been

accused of serving as Iran's mouthpiece in Washington, D.C.

Since then, top members of the Obama administration's national security

team have launched a communications infrastructure after they left the

White House, and have told reporters they are using that infrastructure

to undermine Trump's foreign policy.

"It's actually Ben Rhodes, NIAC, and the Iranian mullahs who are

celebrating today," said one veteran foreign policy insider who is close

to Flynn and the White House. "They know that the number one target

is Iran … [and] they all knew their little sacred agreement with Iran was

going to go off the books. So they got rid of Flynn before any of the

[secret] agreements even surfaced."
This is deeply disturbing and confirms what many principled conservatives
 like Ron Paul and Jack Hunter have discussed. That is, the notion that 
there is an unaccountable deep state at work with its own agenda that
 will sabotage the Madisonian institutions of government if it must. Flynn
 was not just an Iran hawk, he was an advocate for sweeping reform in 
America's intelligence infrastructure. This likely made him a target, and
 because Trump is so unpopular with the political establishment, their 
bold personnel coup will not receive the attention it should. As Damon 
Unelected intelligence analysts work for the president, not the other

way around. Far too many Trump critics appear not to care that these

intelligence agents leaked highly sensitive information to the press —

mostly because Trump critics are pleased with the result. "Finally," they

say, "someone took a stand to expose collusion between the Russians

and a senior aide to the president!" It is indeed important that someone

took such a stand. But it matters greatly who that someone is and how

they take their stand. Members of the unelected, unaccountable

intelligence community are not the right someone, especially when they

target a senior aide to the president by leaking anonymously to

newspapers the content of classified phone intercepts, where the

unverified, unsubstantiated information can inflict politically fatal

damage almost instantaneously.

If Kredo's reports are true, and we have no reason to believe they
 aren't, then Trump needs to act swiftly to drain the swamp and bring
 the national security state to heal. The American people voted for a 
very specific agenda when they elected Trump, and if members of the
 intel community don't like that, they can resign. An agenda that 
empowers Iran is something the American people fiercely reject.